From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] Samsung SoC ADC: use regulator (VDD for ADC).
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 16:40:03 +0100
Message-ID: <20110719154003.GK9652@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
References: <1309420175-10301-1-git-send-email-myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
 <1309420175-10301-2-git-send-email-myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
 <201106301122.50800.anarsoul@gmail.com>
 <20110630160501.GG3249@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
 <037301cc4376$3d7f5a20$b87e0e60$%kim@samsung.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com ([80.75.67.52]:60900 "EHLO
	opensource2.wolfsonmicro.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751475Ab1GSPkF (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 19 Jul 2011 11:40:05 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <037301cc4376$3d7f5a20$b87e0e60$%kim@samsung.com>
Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
To: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: 'Vasily Khoruzhick' <anarsoul@gmail.com>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, 'MyungJoo Ham' <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, 'Russell King' <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>, 'Jassi Brar' <jassi.brar@samsung.com>, 'Kyungmin Park' <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>, myungjoo.ham@gmail.com, 'Ben Dooks' <ben-linux@fluff.org>, 'Seungwhan Youn' <sw.youn@samsung.com>, 'Changhwan Youn' <chaos.youn@samsung.com>, 'Marek Szyprowski' <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>

On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 02:07:13PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> Mark Brown wrote:

> > If there isn't a separate supply for the regulators on S3C24xx devices
> > then I guess the best option is to provide that supply as a dummy
> > regulator in the s3c24xx core code.

> OK, but it means I can't apply this until adding a dummy regulator for
> S3C24XX?

That could always come later as a bug fix :)  The regulator API does
have a couple of methods of substituting in a dummy regulator itself,
though it does complain a bit, so it should mostly be a simple config
change to work around on affected systems.

From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown)
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 16:40:03 +0100
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/6] Samsung SoC ADC: use regulator (VDD for ADC).
In-Reply-To: <037301cc4376$3d7f5a20$b87e0e60$%kim@samsung.com>
References: <1309420175-10301-1-git-send-email-myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
	<1309420175-10301-2-git-send-email-myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
	<201106301122.50800.anarsoul@gmail.com>
	<20110630160501.GG3249@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
	<037301cc4376$3d7f5a20$b87e0e60$%kim@samsung.com>
Message-ID: <20110719154003.GK9652@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 02:07:13PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> Mark Brown wrote:

> > If there isn't a separate supply for the regulators on S3C24xx devices
> > then I guess the best option is to provide that supply as a dummy
> > regulator in the s3c24xx core code.

> OK, but it means I can't apply this until adding a dummy regulator for
> S3C24XX?

That could always come later as a bug fix :)  The regulator API does
have a couple of methods of substituting in a dummy regulator itself,
though it does complain a bit, so it should mostly be a simple config
change to work around on affected systems.