All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	neilb@suse.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfs: fix race in rcu lookup of pruned dentry
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 00:52:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110719235215.GS11013@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110719234550.GR11013@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>

On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 12:45:51AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:

> You know what...  I doubt that you want to mess with ->d_seq checks here.
> It's definitely not Hugh's bug (unless he has bindings somewhere odd) and
> both ->mnt_mountpoint and ->mnt_root are pinned (and we are holding
> vfsmount_lock anyway).  *inode assignment too early is a real bug, indeed,
> and we want to assign nd->seq if we cross mountpoint as both versions do,
> but check just before that is, in the best case, BUG_ON() fodder.  We'd
> just found a vfsmount with ->mnt_mountpoint equal to path->dentry; it *can't*
> be stale, or we have a really nasty problem anyway.

Kudos to neilb for spotting the pointless check, BTW; and no, his theory
that it might be needed since we could race with umount() is wrong - due to
vfsmount_lock being held.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-07-19 23:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-17 21:03 [PATCH] vfs: fix race in rcu lookup of pruned dentry Hugh Dickins
2011-07-17 22:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-17 22:59   ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-17 23:26     ` Al Viro
2011-07-17 23:16   ` Al Viro
2011-07-17 23:38     ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-17 23:47       ` Hugh Dickins
2011-07-18  0:25         ` Al Viro
2011-07-18  1:13           ` Hugh Dickins
2011-07-18  2:08             ` Al Viro
2011-07-18  6:31               ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-18  6:31                 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-18 14:41                 ` Hugh Dickins
2011-07-18 18:11                 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-18 18:20                   ` Al Viro
2011-07-18 19:08                     ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-18 19:20                       ` Al Viro
2011-07-18 19:23                         ` Al Viro
2011-07-18 19:34                         ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-18 19:04                   ` Hugh Dickins
2011-07-18 19:33                     ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-18 19:47                       ` Al Viro
2011-07-18 20:24                         ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-18 21:19                           ` Hugh Dickins
2011-07-18 21:42                             ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-18 22:43                               ` Hugh Dickins
2011-07-18 23:17                                 ` Al Viro
2011-07-18 23:21                                   ` Al Viro
2011-07-18 23:27                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-18 23:40                                       ` Al Viro
2011-07-19  2:07                                         ` Hugh Dickins
2011-07-19  2:14                                           ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-19  2:14                                             ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-19  2:17                                             ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-19  2:23                                               ` Al Viro
2011-07-19  2:37                                                 ` Chris Ball
2011-07-19  4:41                                                 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-07-19  2:21                                           ` Al Viro
2011-07-19 23:45                               ` Al Viro
2011-07-19 23:52                                 ` Al Viro [this message]
2011-07-19 23:55                                   ` Al Viro
2011-07-20  0:47                                     ` NeilBrown
2011-07-20  1:40                                       ` Al Viro
2011-07-20  4:52                                         ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-20  4:52                                           ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-19 23:56                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-20  0:04                                   ` Al Viro
2011-07-17 23:53       ` Al Viro
2011-07-17 23:31   ` Hugh Dickins
2011-07-17 23:52     ` Linus Torvalds

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110719235215.GS11013@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=npiggin@kernel.dk \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.