diff for duplicates of <20110720105540.1c9d072c@maggie> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 3f82854..dfd054d 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -1,11 +1,11 @@ On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 08:16:08 +0200 -Rafa? Mi?ecki <zajec5@gmail.com> wrote: +Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> wrote: -> W dniu 20 lipca 2011 01:15 u?ytkownik Michael B?sch <m@bues.ch> napisa?: +> W dniu 20 lipca 2011 01:15 użytkownik Michael Büsch <m@bues.ch> napisał: > > On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 00:12:20 +0200 -> > Rafa? Mi?ecki <zajec5@gmail.com> wrote: -> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ?* be fixed on ssb side, but requires testing with b43, -> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ?* b43legacy and b44. */ +> > Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> wrote: +> >> + * be fixed on ssb side, but requires testing with b43, +> >> + * b43legacy and b44. */ > > > > No it doesn't. b44 and b43legacy don't use 64bit DMA. > > Just fix it in ssb, please. diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 34a7da8..f1f2e27 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ "ref\020110720011509.504022f8@maggie\0" "ref\0CACna6rwMe9-dHANpDLko5yy5wu521YTGXmqBr1JYh18tYt+Z4A@mail.gmail.com\0" "From\0Michael B\303\274sch <m@bues.ch>\0" - "Subject\0[PATCH 1/3] b43: replace DMA translation workarounds with just a one, commented\0" + "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 1/3] b43: replace DMA translation workarounds with just a one, commented\0" "Date\0Wed, 20 Jul 2011 10:55:40 +0200\0" "To\0Rafa\305\202 Mi\305\202ecki <zajec5@gmail.com>\0" "Cc\0linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" @@ -13,13 +13,13 @@ "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 08:16:08 +0200\n" - "Rafa? Mi?ecki <zajec5@gmail.com> wrote:\n" + "Rafa\305\202 Mi\305\202ecki <zajec5@gmail.com> wrote:\n" "\n" - "> W dniu 20 lipca 2011 01:15 u?ytkownik Michael B?sch <m@bues.ch> napisa?:\n" + "> W dniu 20 lipca 2011 01:15 u\305\274ytkownik Michael B\303\274sch <m@bues.ch> napisa\305\202:\n" "> > On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 00:12:20 +0200\n" - "> > Rafa? Mi?ecki <zajec5@gmail.com> wrote:\n" - "> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ?* be fixed on ssb side, but requires testing with b43,\n" - "> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ?* b43legacy and b44. */\n" + "> > Rafa\305\202 Mi\305\202ecki <zajec5@gmail.com> wrote:\n" + "> >> + \302\240 \302\240 \302\240 \302\240 \302\240 \302\240 \302\240* be fixed on ssb side, but requires testing with b43,\n" + "> >> + \302\240 \302\240 \302\240 \302\240 \302\240 \302\240 \302\240* b43legacy and b44. */\n" "> >\n" "> > No it doesn't. b44 and b43legacy don't use 64bit DMA.\n" "> > Just fix it in ssb, please.\n" @@ -40,4 +40,4 @@ "Simply pass the \"32 or 64 bit\" boolean flag to ssb_dma_translation() as parameter.\n" There's nothing that can go wrong here with older drivers. -85cf7f7d079bdf1a04c8e9a01894a233bae648a00e5f410fd1281b45c8bbb3f3 +10ebf4b0716ac9280c3706584b3c16f49cb1fc999016fb6c96a03b24c1c7b9c4
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.