From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vivek Goyal Subject: Re: new cg-manager gui tool for managin cgroups Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 16:42:40 -0400 Message-ID: <20110720204240.GF10079@redhat.com> References: <20110720192029.GD2482@redhat.com> <20110720202831.GA11395@tango.0pointer.de> Reply-To: Development discussions related to Fedora Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110720202831.GA11395@tango.0pointer.de> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: devel-bounces@lists.fedoraproject.org Errors-To: devel-bounces@lists.fedoraproject.org To: Lennart Poettering Cc: fedora-devel-list@redhat.com, containers@lists.osdl.org, duffy@redhat.com, cg-manager-developers@lists.fedorahosted.org List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 10:28:32PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: [..] > > > Right now, the gui assumes that the various hierarchies are mounted separately, > > but that the cpu and cpuacct are co-mounted. Its my understanding that this > > is consistent with how systemd is doing things. So that's great. > > In F15 we mount all controllers enabled in the kernel separately. In F16 > we'll optionally mount some of them together, and we'll probably ship a > default of mounting cpu and cpuacct together if they are both enabled. Last time we talked about possibility of co-mounting memory and IO at some point of time and you said it is a bad idea from applications programming point of view. Has that changed now? Thanks Vivek -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel