From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [REPOST][PATCH v4 3/4] ASoC: SAMSUNG: Modify I2S driver to support idma Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 10:24:21 +0100 Message-ID: <20110721092421.GA29595@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1311149233-24343-1-git-send-email-sbkim73@samsung.com> <20110720195911.GF26043@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <034601cc4731$e82f3800$b88da800$@com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from opensource2.wolfsonmicro.com (opensource.wolfsonmicro.com [80.75.67.52]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id A55CD103915 for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 11:24:25 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <034601cc4731$e82f3800$b88da800$@com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Sangbeom Kim Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, jassisinghbrar@gmail.com, lrg@slimlogic.co.uk List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 08:08:15AM +0900, Sangbeom Kim wrote: > On Thursday, July 21, 2011 at 04:59:12AM +0900, Mark Brown wrote: > > I've applied this and patch 4 as they seem to make sense by themselves > > but I can't see patch 1 or patch 2? > Patch1 and Patch2 had already applied. And I checked in for-next branch. > http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2011-June/041321.html Right, but they're not part of your current posting. The patch numbering you're using needs to make sense within the series you're posting, just ignore the numbering you used in previous postings.