From: Solar Designer <solar@openwall.com>
To: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com
Subject: [kernel-hardening] LWN: Reactive vs. pro-active kernel security
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 00:09:57 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110721200957.GA4124@openwall.com> (raw)
Hi,
Last week's LWN has a story on the kernel hardening work by Vasiliy,
Kees, and Dan - as well as on the difficulty in getting such patches
accepted upstream:
http://lwn.net/Articles/451405/
Of interest are the links to similar LWN stories on things that Kees and
Dan worked on (which Vasiliy thus excluded from his GSoC work so far).
These were symlink in +t directory hardening and kernel address non-leaks.
Alexander
reply other threads:[~2011-07-21 20:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110721200957.GA4124@openwall.com \
--to=solar@openwall.com \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.