From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Luca Berra Subject: Re: [PATCH] RAID-6 check standalone suspend array V2.0 Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 08:41:59 +0200 Message-ID: <20110722064159.GA19151@maude.comedia.it> References: <20110321115440.GA15635@lazy.lzy> <20110322095905.737fb1d5@notabene.brown> <20110404175242.GA3411@lazy.lzy> <20110405091242.3427e0b1@notabene.brown> <20110508185408.GA25378@lazy.lzy> <20110509114500.116926ba@notabene.brown> <20110509184333.GA28743@lazy.lzy> <20110515211515.GA30260@lazy.lzy> <20110516200857.3a009a64@notabene.brown> <4E2716EF.1050509@nexgo.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E2716EF.1050509@nexgo.de> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 07:57:03PM +0200, Piergiorgio Sartor wrote: >Hi Neil, > >sorry for the very late answer. > >On 05/16/2011 12:08 PM, NeilBrown wrote: >> On Sun, 15 May 2011 23:15:15 +0200 Piergiorgio Sartor >>> Thanks again for your help, again let me know what >>> is the next expected step. >> >> That all looks fine thank. I've applied it and pushed it out. >> >> I'm not sure what you mean exactly by the 'next expected step'... > >Well, is there anything than should be done, like >documentation or code cleanup? I would love if you could also provide a man page Regards, L. -- Luca Berra -- bluca@comedia.it