From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ASoC: dapm - Add API call to query the widgets of valid DAPM paths. Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 09:40:15 +0100 Message-ID: <20110722084014.GE23192@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1311160995-3475-1-git-send-email-lrg@ti.com> <20110720201524.GG26043@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <4E288376.2040500@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from opensource2.wolfsonmicro.com (opensource.wolfsonmicro.com [80.75.67.52]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29C0C243A9 for ; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 10:40:17 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E288376.2040500@ti.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Liam Girdwood Cc: "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 08:52:22PM +0100, Liam Girdwood wrote: > On 20/07/11 21:15, Mark Brown wrote: > > Hrm, this will only check the widgets connected to the first widget it > > sees for an AIF. For streams with multiple widgets connected (eg, left > > and right channel) it's only going to see things on the first widget it > > comes across which probably isn't what we were expecting. Unless we > > change to match the comment and query by widget name in which case we're > > already requiring uniqueness. > Yes, but I cant think of any single channel AIFs atm, unless Wolfson has some ? Some of the older devices have mono voice AIFs but nothing current. I do think working by stream name is better.