From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754813Ab1GVSXi (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jul 2011 14:23:38 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:58634 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754674Ab1GVSXh (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jul 2011 14:23:37 -0400 Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 20:20:18 +0200 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Linus Torvalds , Denys Vlasenko , Tejun Heo , Vladimir Zapolskiy , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Evgeniy Polyakov Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ptrace changes for v3.1 Message-ID: <20110722182018.GA18447@redhat.com> References: <20110722173237.GA16787@redhat.com> <20110722180312.GA744@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110722180312.GA744@infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (add Evgeniy) On 07/22, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 07:32:37PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > - f701e5b7 "connector: add an event for monitoring process tracers" is > > a bit off-topic, it was routed via ptrace branch because it textually > > depends on the changes in tracehook/ptrace_attach code. > > Please do not actually add anything to the connector code. It's a > horrible interface and users should migrate away from it. I never understood who can use this interface and for what. But it has users. As for this patch. This feature was acked by maintainers, I do not think I can argue. Fortunately, the patch adds nothing without CONFIG_PROC_EVENTS. Oleg.