All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: akpm@linux-foundation.org
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: oleg@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net, johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru,
	vzapolskiy@gmail.com, zbr@ioremap.net
Subject: + proc_fork_connector-a-lockless-real_parent-usage-is-not-safe.patch added to -mm tree
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:37:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201107222237.p6MMbrJC019264@imap1.linux-foundation.org> (raw)


The patch titled
     proc_fork_connector: a lockless ->real_parent usage is not safe
has been added to the -mm tree.  Its filename is
     proc_fork_connector-a-lockless-real_parent-usage-is-not-safe.patch

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***

See http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/stuff/added-to-mm.txt to find
out what to do about this

The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/

------------------------------------------------------
Subject: proc_fork_connector: a lockless ->real_parent usage is not safe
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>

proc_fork_connector() uses ->real_parent lockless.  This is not safe if
copy_process() was called with CLONE_THREAD or CLONE_PARENT, in this case
the parent != current can go away at any moment.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vzapolskiy@gmail.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@ioremap.net>
Cc: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 drivers/connector/cn_proc.c |    8 ++++++--
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff -puN drivers/connector/cn_proc.c~proc_fork_connector-a-lockless-real_parent-usage-is-not-safe drivers/connector/cn_proc.c
--- a/drivers/connector/cn_proc.c~proc_fork_connector-a-lockless-real_parent-usage-is-not-safe
+++ a/drivers/connector/cn_proc.c
@@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ void proc_fork_connector(struct task_str
 	struct proc_event *ev;
 	__u8 buffer[CN_PROC_MSG_SIZE];
 	struct timespec ts;
+	struct task_struct *parent;
 
 	if (atomic_read(&proc_event_num_listeners) < 1)
 		return;
@@ -66,8 +67,11 @@ void proc_fork_connector(struct task_str
 	ktime_get_ts(&ts); /* get high res monotonic timestamp */
 	put_unaligned(timespec_to_ns(&ts), (__u64 *)&ev->timestamp_ns);
 	ev->what = PROC_EVENT_FORK;
-	ev->event_data.fork.parent_pid = task->real_parent->pid;
-	ev->event_data.fork.parent_tgid = task->real_parent->tgid;
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	parent = rcu_dereference(task->real_parent);
+	ev->event_data.fork.parent_pid = parent->pid;
+	ev->event_data.fork.parent_tgid = parent->tgid;
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 	ev->event_data.fork.child_pid = task->pid;
 	ev->event_data.fork.child_tgid = task->tgid;
 
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from oleg@redhat.com are

xtensa-prevent-arbitrary-read-in-ptrace.patch
xtensa-prevent-arbitrary-read-in-ptrace-fix.patch
linux-next.patch
proc_fork_connector-a-lockless-real_parent-usage-is-not-safe.patch
ptrace-unify-show_regs-prototype.patch
ptrace-unify-show_regs-prototype-fix.patch
signals-sys_ssetmask-sys_rt_sigsuspend-should-use-set_current_blocked.patch
coredump-use-task-comm-instead-of-unknown.patch
do_coredump-fix-the-ispipe-error-check.patch
fs-execc-acct_arg_size-ptl-is-no-longer-needed-for-add_mm_counter.patch
ipc-introduce-shm_rmid_forced-sysctl.patch
ipc-introduce-shm_rmid_forced-sysctl-fix-2.patch
ipc-introduce-shm_rmid_forced-sysctl-testing.patch


                 reply	other threads:[~2011-07-22 22:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201107222237.p6MMbrJC019264@imap1.linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=vzapolskiy@gmail.com \
    --cc=zbr@ioremap.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.