From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p6OBgfXh206297 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 06:42:41 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 171309176F for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 04:42:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.166.109.252]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id yDtfHHZbFR7cSSze for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2011 04:42:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 07:42:35 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: push i_mutex and filemap_write_and_wait down into ->fsync() handlers Message-ID: <20110724114235.GG26332@infradead.org> References: <1309370716-12235-1-git-send-email-josef@redhat.com> <20110723180942.GA1616@x4.trippels.de> <4E2B2E88.8080006@redhat.com> <20110723203824.GB1652@x4.trippels.de> <20110723220212.GA1648@x4.trippels.de> <20110724111625.GA12658@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110724111625.GA12658@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Markus Trippelsdorf Cc: jack@suse.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, hch@infradead.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Josef Bacik On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 07:16:26AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 12:02:12AM +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: > > The following patch fixes the problem for me: > > Good catch, can you send it with a proper signoff and description? This also fixes the xfstests 130 regression that popped up in latest Linus HEAD. Good to know we have some QA coverage for O_SYNC writes, althoug I wish it would be more than just one testcase.. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752580Ab1GXLmp (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Jul 2011 07:42:45 -0400 Received: from 173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([173.166.109.252]:34622 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752514Ab1GXLmk (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Jul 2011 07:42:40 -0400 Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 07:42:35 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Markus Trippelsdorf Cc: jack@suse.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, hch@infradead.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Josef Bacik Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: push i_mutex and filemap_write_and_wait down into ->fsync() handlers Message-ID: <20110724114235.GG26332@infradead.org> References: <1309370716-12235-1-git-send-email-josef@redhat.com> <20110723180942.GA1616@x4.trippels.de> <4E2B2E88.8080006@redhat.com> <20110723203824.GB1652@x4.trippels.de> <20110723220212.GA1648@x4.trippels.de> <20110724111625.GA12658@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110724111625.GA12658@infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 07:16:26AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 12:02:12AM +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: > > The following patch fixes the problem for me: > > Good catch, can you send it with a proper signoff and description? This also fixes the xfstests 130 regression that popped up in latest Linus HEAD. Good to know we have some QA coverage for O_SYNC writes, althoug I wish it would be more than just one testcase..