From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, avi@redhat.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, gorcunov@gmail.com, levinsasha928@gmail.com,
asias.hejun@gmail.com, prasadjoshi124@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Native Linux KVM tool for 3.1
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 12:35:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110725103517.GL28787@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C79981BA-CFE9-48CD-839D-1ABD72DF266C@suse.de>
* Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> wrote:
>
> On 25.07.2011, at 12:16, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> >>
> >>> So it was a no brainer for me to pull it into -tip.
> >>
> >> The thing I don't agree with is that it should live in the
> >> kernel tree.
> >
> > FYI, tools/kvm/ *already* lives in the kernel tree - that is how
> > it's developed and used and it also shares code with the kernel.
>
> So you're just trying to make this a self-fulfilling prophecy now?
No, i'm just trying to point out to you that it's already a fact that
the tool already lives in a kernel tree and was developed there to
the tune of 700+ commits within a few short months.
IMO you should not be arguing:
'You should do X because that's my preference.'
IMO you should be arguing:
'You should do X because technical advantage Y which is important to the project.'
We have listed numerous technical advantages of why we have chosen
tools/kvm/ - and you have not countered that with any convincing
technical disadvantage so far.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-25 10:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-24 20:37 [GIT PULL] Native Linux KVM tool for 3.1 Pekka Enberg
2011-07-24 23:12 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-07-25 7:37 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-07-25 7:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-25 8:14 ` Alexander Graf
2011-07-25 8:23 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-07-25 8:31 ` Alexander Graf
2011-07-25 8:35 ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-25 13:10 ` Joerg Roedel
2011-07-25 15:05 ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-25 8:37 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-07-25 8:44 ` Alexander Graf
2011-07-25 8:51 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-07-25 8:55 ` Alexander Graf
2011-07-25 9:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-25 9:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-25 8:30 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-07-25 8:37 ` Alexander Graf
2011-07-25 8:47 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-07-25 9:06 ` Alexander Graf
2011-07-25 12:45 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-07-25 12:47 ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-25 12:51 ` Sasha Levin
2011-07-25 12:54 ` Alexander Graf
2011-07-25 13:14 ` Sasha Levin
2011-07-25 12:51 ` Alexander Graf
2011-07-25 13:09 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-07-25 13:29 ` Alexander Graf
2011-07-25 9:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-25 9:42 ` Alexander Graf
2011-07-25 10:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-25 10:21 ` Alexander Graf
2011-07-25 10:35 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2011-07-25 10:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-25 12:24 ` Kevin Wolf
2011-07-25 12:41 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-07-25 12:46 ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-25 8:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-25 8:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-25 9:03 ` Alexander Graf
2011-07-25 9:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-25 9:46 ` Alexander Graf
2011-07-25 10:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-25 9:48 ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-25 10:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-25 10:17 ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-25 10:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-25 11:26 ` Olivier Galibert
2011-07-25 10:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-25 11:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-25 11:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-25 11:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-25 11:34 ` Olivier Galibert
2011-07-25 11:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-25 12:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-25 12:36 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-07-25 19:21 ` david
2011-07-25 18:24 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-07-25 19:43 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-07-25 7:50 ` Sasha Levin
2011-07-25 8:34 ` Alexander Graf
2011-07-25 12:59 ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-07-25 13:16 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-07-25 1:19 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-07-25 7:27 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-07-25 7:36 ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-25 7:39 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-07-25 7:55 ` Sasha Levin
[not found] ` <CAFO3S428qqUAu19QjPxDDAVv+eJSX0MEfYp5y03znNi6XbEtTg@mail.gmail.com>
2011-07-25 8:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-25 8:17 ` Pekka Enberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110725103517.GL28787@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=asias.hejun@gmail.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@web.de \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=levinsasha928@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=prasadjoshi124@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.