All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Liam Girdwood <lrg@ti.com>
Cc: "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ASoC: dapm - Add API call to query the widgets of valid DAPM paths.
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 12:41:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110726114117.GD7285@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1311678996.4088.4.camel@CNA0741383>

On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 12:16:36PM +0100, Liam Girdwood wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 23:16 +0200, Mark Brown wrote:

> > Hrm, so I must be missing something here but this still has the issue
> > with only finding the first widget if we've got more than one widget for
> > a stream.  For example, the tlv320aic3x driver defines:

> >    SND_SOC_DAPM_DAC("Left DAC", "Left Playback", DAC_PWR, 7, 0),
> >    SND_SOC_DAPM_DAC("Right DAC", "Right Playback", DAC_PWR, 6, 0),

> > and hooks them both up to a single "Playback" stream (most devices don't
> > even have the distinct names at the widget level).  

> This will only match on the exact name here. So we can retrieve both
> left and right stream widgets by making two separate calls. We should
> also not have two AIF widgets with the same stream name within a DAPM
> context.

OK, right.  If we want to do that then a substantial proportion of the
existing CODEC drivers are broken - they're routinely putting in the
stream name they want to match against rather than adding extra text to
the stream to give unique names that are never used.

It does feel like this ought to be looking things up by widget rather
than by stream, though.  Widget names are already guaranteed unique and
if the users do want to look things up for a single widget only it seems
to make sense to ask for that widget rather than ask for a stream as
it's not how we're currently using streams.  It feels like if we're
asking for a stream we should do the same substring multi-match that we
do when pushing events into them.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-07-26 11:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-25 10:15 [PATCH v3] ASoC: dapm - Add API call to query the widgets of valid DAPM paths Liam Girdwood
2011-07-25 21:16 ` Mark Brown
2011-07-26 11:16   ` Liam Girdwood
2011-07-26 11:41     ` Mark Brown [this message]
2011-07-26 14:26       ` Liam Girdwood
2011-07-26 14:37         ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110726114117.GD7285@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=lrg@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.