From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, XFS <xfs@oss.sgi.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] Reduce filesystem writeback from page reclaim v2
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 08:37:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110727073737.GG3010@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEwNFnA_OGUYfCQrLCMt9NuU0O0ftWWBB4_Si8NypKyaeuRg2A@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 01:32:17PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> >
> > http://www.csn.ul.ie/~mel/postings/reclaim-20110721
> >
> > Unfortunately, the volume of data is excessive but here is a partial
> > summary of what was interesting for XFS.
>
> Could you clarify the notation?
> 1P : 1 Processor?
> 512M: system memory size?
> 2X , 4X, 16X: the size of files created during test
>
1P == 1 Processor
512M == 512M RAM (mem=512M)
2X == 2 x NUM_CPU fsmark threads
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, XFS <xfs@oss.sgi.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] Reduce filesystem writeback from page reclaim v2
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 08:37:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110727073737.GG3010@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEwNFnA_OGUYfCQrLCMt9NuU0O0ftWWBB4_Si8NypKyaeuRg2A@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 01:32:17PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> >
> > http://www.csn.ul.ie/~mel/postings/reclaim-20110721
> >
> > Unfortunately, the volume of data is excessive but here is a partial
> > summary of what was interesting for XFS.
>
> Could you clarify the notation?
> 1P : 1 Processor?
> 512M: system memory size?
> 2X , 4X, 16X: the size of files created during test
>
1P == 1 Processor
512M == 512M RAM (mem=512M)
2X == 2 x NUM_CPU fsmark threads
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, XFS <xfs@oss.sgi.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] Reduce filesystem writeback from page reclaim v2
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 08:37:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110727073737.GG3010@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEwNFnA_OGUYfCQrLCMt9NuU0O0ftWWBB4_Si8NypKyaeuRg2A@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 01:32:17PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> >
> > http://www.csn.ul.ie/~mel/postings/reclaim-20110721
> >
> > Unfortunately, the volume of data is excessive but here is a partial
> > summary of what was interesting for XFS.
>
> Could you clarify the notation?
> 1P : 1 Processor?
> 512M: system memory size?
> 2X , 4X, 16X: the size of files created during test
>
1P == 1 Processor
512M == 512M RAM (mem=512M)
2X == 2 x NUM_CPU fsmark threads
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-27 7:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 129+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-21 16:28 [RFC PATCH 0/8] Reduce filesystem writeback from page reclaim v2 Mel Gorman
2011-07-21 16:28 ` Mel Gorman
2011-07-21 16:28 ` Mel Gorman
2011-07-21 16:28 ` [PATCH 1/8] mm: vmscan: Do not writeback filesystem pages in direct reclaim Mel Gorman
2011-07-21 16:28 ` Mel Gorman
2011-07-21 16:28 ` Mel Gorman
2011-07-31 15:06 ` Minchan Kim
2011-07-31 15:06 ` Minchan Kim
2011-07-31 15:06 ` Minchan Kim
2011-08-02 11:21 ` Mel Gorman
2011-08-02 11:21 ` Mel Gorman
2011-08-02 11:21 ` Mel Gorman
2011-07-21 16:28 ` [PATCH 2/8] xfs: Warn if direct reclaim tries to writeback pages Mel Gorman
2011-07-21 16:28 ` Mel Gorman
2011-07-21 16:28 ` Mel Gorman
2011-07-24 11:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-24 11:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-24 11:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-25 8:19 ` Mel Gorman
2011-07-25 8:19 ` Mel Gorman
2011-07-25 8:19 ` Mel Gorman
2011-07-21 16:28 ` [PATCH 3/8] ext4: " Mel Gorman
2011-07-21 16:28 ` Mel Gorman
2011-07-21 16:28 ` Mel Gorman
2011-08-03 10:58 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-08-03 10:58 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-08-03 10:58 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-08-03 11:06 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-08-03 11:06 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-08-03 11:06 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-08-03 13:44 ` Mel Gorman
2011-08-03 13:44 ` Mel Gorman
2011-08-03 13:44 ` Mel Gorman
2011-08-03 14:00 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-08-03 14:00 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-08-03 14:00 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-08-03 14:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-08-03 14:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-08-03 14:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-08-03 14:35 ` Mel Gorman
2011-08-03 14:35 ` Mel Gorman
2011-08-03 14:35 ` Mel Gorman
2011-07-21 16:28 ` [PATCH 4/8] btrfs: " Mel Gorman
2011-07-21 16:28 ` Mel Gorman
2011-07-21 16:28 ` Mel Gorman
2011-08-03 11:10 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-08-03 11:10 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-08-03 11:10 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-08-03 13:45 ` Mel Gorman
2011-08-03 13:45 ` Mel Gorman
2011-08-03 13:45 ` Mel Gorman
2011-07-21 16:28 ` [PATCH 5/8] mm: vmscan: Do not writeback filesystem pages in kswapd except in high priority Mel Gorman
2011-07-21 16:28 ` Mel Gorman
2011-07-21 16:28 ` Mel Gorman
2011-07-31 15:11 ` Minchan Kim
2011-07-31 15:11 ` Minchan Kim
2011-07-31 15:11 ` Minchan Kim
2011-07-21 16:28 ` [PATCH 6/8] mm: vmscan: Throttle reclaim if encountering too many dirty pages under writeback Mel Gorman
2011-07-21 16:28 ` Mel Gorman
2011-07-21 16:28 ` Mel Gorman
2011-07-31 15:17 ` Minchan Kim
2011-07-31 15:17 ` Minchan Kim
2011-07-31 15:17 ` Minchan Kim
2011-08-03 11:19 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-08-03 11:19 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-08-03 11:19 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-08-03 13:56 ` Mel Gorman
2011-08-03 13:56 ` Mel Gorman
2011-08-03 13:56 ` Mel Gorman
2011-07-21 16:28 ` [PATCH 7/8] mm: vmscan: Immediately reclaim end-of-LRU dirty pages when writeback completes Mel Gorman
2011-07-21 16:28 ` Mel Gorman
2011-07-21 16:28 ` Mel Gorman
2011-07-22 12:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-22 12:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-22 12:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-22 13:23 ` Mel Gorman
2011-07-22 13:23 ` Mel Gorman
2011-07-22 13:23 ` Mel Gorman
2011-07-31 15:24 ` Minchan Kim
2011-07-31 15:24 ` Minchan Kim
2011-07-31 15:24 ` Minchan Kim
2011-08-02 11:25 ` Mel Gorman
2011-08-02 11:25 ` Mel Gorman
2011-08-02 11:25 ` Mel Gorman
2011-08-03 11:26 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-08-03 11:26 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-08-03 11:26 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-08-03 13:57 ` Mel Gorman
2011-08-03 13:57 ` Mel Gorman
2011-08-03 13:57 ` Mel Gorman
2011-07-21 16:28 ` [PATCH 8/8] mm: vmscan: Do not writeback filesystem pages from kswapd Mel Gorman
2011-07-21 16:28 ` Mel Gorman
2011-07-21 16:28 ` Mel Gorman
2011-07-22 12:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-22 12:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-22 12:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-22 13:31 ` Mel Gorman
2011-07-22 13:31 ` Mel Gorman
2011-07-22 13:31 ` Mel Gorman
2011-08-03 11:37 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-08-03 11:37 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-08-03 11:37 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-08-03 13:58 ` Mel Gorman
2011-08-03 13:58 ` Mel Gorman
2011-08-03 13:58 ` Mel Gorman
2011-07-26 11:20 ` [RFC PATCH 0/8] Reduce filesystem writeback from page reclaim v2 Dave Chinner
2011-07-26 11:20 ` Dave Chinner
2011-07-26 11:20 ` Dave Chinner
2011-07-27 4:32 ` Minchan Kim
2011-07-27 4:32 ` Minchan Kim
2011-07-27 4:32 ` Minchan Kim
2011-07-27 7:37 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2011-07-27 7:37 ` Mel Gorman
2011-07-27 7:37 ` Mel Gorman
2011-07-27 16:18 ` Minchan Kim
2011-07-27 16:18 ` Minchan Kim
2011-07-27 16:18 ` Minchan Kim
2011-07-28 11:38 ` Mel Gorman
2011-07-28 11:38 ` Mel Gorman
2011-07-28 11:38 ` Mel Gorman
2011-07-29 9:48 ` Minchan Kim
2011-07-29 9:48 ` Minchan Kim
2011-07-29 9:48 ` Minchan Kim
2011-07-29 9:50 ` Minchan Kim
2011-07-29 9:50 ` Minchan Kim
2011-07-29 9:50 ` Minchan Kim
2011-07-29 13:41 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-07-29 13:41 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-07-29 13:41 ` Andrew Lutomirski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110727073737.GG3010@suse.de \
--to=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jweiner@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.