From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p6R7bkjw167817 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 02:37:47 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 387B6168699C for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 00:37:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx2.suse.de (cantor2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 2ZZCPDAvK3KgzxRR for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 00:37:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 08:37:37 +0100 From: Mel Gorman Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] Reduce filesystem writeback from page reclaim v2 Message-ID: <20110727073737.GG3010@suse.de> References: <1311265730-5324-1-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Minchan Kim Cc: Rik van Riel , Jan Kara , LKML , XFS , Christoph Hellwig , Linux-MM , Wu Fengguang , Johannes Weiner On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 01:32:17PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: > > > > http://www.csn.ul.ie/~mel/postings/reclaim-20110721 > > > > Unfortunately, the volume of data is excessive but here is a partial > > summary of what was interesting for XFS. > > Could you clarify the notation? > 1P : 1 Processor? > 512M: system memory size? > 2X , 4X, 16X: the size of files created during test > 1P == 1 Processor 512M == 512M RAM (mem=512M) 2X == 2 x NUM_CPU fsmark threads -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752930Ab1G0Hhq (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jul 2011 03:37:46 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:51879 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751615Ab1G0Hho (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jul 2011 03:37:44 -0400 Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 08:37:37 +0100 From: Mel Gorman To: Minchan Kim Cc: Linux-MM , LKML , XFS , Dave Chinner , Christoph Hellwig , Johannes Weiner , Wu Fengguang , Jan Kara , Rik van Riel Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] Reduce filesystem writeback from page reclaim v2 Message-ID: <20110727073737.GG3010@suse.de> References: <1311265730-5324-1-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 01:32:17PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: > > > > http://www.csn.ul.ie/~mel/postings/reclaim-20110721 > > > > Unfortunately, the volume of data is excessive but here is a partial > > summary of what was interesting for XFS. > > Could you clarify the notation? > 1P : 1 Processor? > 512M: system memory size? > 2X , 4X, 16X: the size of files created during test > 1P == 1 Processor 512M == 512M RAM (mem=512M) 2X == 2 x NUM_CPU fsmark threads -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail138.messagelabs.com (mail138.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.35]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEA166B00EE for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 03:37:46 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 08:37:37 +0100 From: Mel Gorman Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] Reduce filesystem writeback from page reclaim v2 Message-ID: <20110727073737.GG3010@suse.de> References: <1311265730-5324-1-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Minchan Kim Cc: Linux-MM , LKML , XFS , Dave Chinner , Christoph Hellwig , Johannes Weiner , Wu Fengguang , Jan Kara , Rik van Riel On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 01:32:17PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: > > > > http://www.csn.ul.ie/~mel/postings/reclaim-20110721 > > > > Unfortunately, the volume of data is excessive but here is a partial > > summary of what was interesting for XFS. > > Could you clarify the notation? > 1P : 1 Processor? > 512M: system memory size? > 2X , 4X, 16X: the size of files created during test > 1P == 1 Processor 512M == 512M RAM (mem=512M) 2X == 2 x NUM_CPU fsmark threads -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org