Re: [PATCH 14/18] revert: Introduce --reset to remove sequencer state

[Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>]

Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
> Jonathan Nieder writes:
>> Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:

>>> +     if (opts->subcommand == REPLAY_RESET) {
>>> +             remove_sequencer_state(1);
>>> +             return 0;
>>> +     } else {
>>> +             /* Start a new cherry-pick/ revert sequence */
>>
>> Can un-indent by dropping the "else":
>
> Actually this was intentional; if we un-indent this now, there'll be a
> diff indenting it when '--reset' and '--continue' are introduced which
> turns out to be especially ugly :)

Why couldn't it look like this at the end, for example?  (As always,
this is just an example; I am not saying "please make it look like
this".)

	if (opts->subcommand == REPLAY_RESET) {
		remove_sequencer_state(1);
		return 0;
	}

	if (opts->subcommand == REPLAY_CONTINUE) {
		... prepare todo list for continue ...
	} else {
		... prepare todo list for a new cherry-pick ...
	}
	pick the chosen commits

>> This is not about this patch, but ideally the cleanup would come at
>> the beginning of the next test, so if one test fails it does not take
>> down all the tests that come after it.
>
> Good point.  Fixed all, thanks.

Thanks for looking into it.