From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754939Ab1G0U77 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jul 2011 16:59:59 -0400 Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:60755 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753839Ab1G0U76 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jul 2011 16:59:58 -0400 Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 22:59:57 +0200 From: Andi Kleen To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Eric Dumazet , Tim Chen , Al Viro , David Miller , Andi Kleen , Matthew Wilcox , Anton Blanchard , npiggin@kernel.dk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, netdev Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfs: avoid taking locks if inode not in lists Message-ID: <20110727205957.GC8006@one.firstfloor.org> References: <20110723132411.GA22183@infradead.org> <1311633550.2576.33.camel@schen9-DESK> <20110725225154.GD22133@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <1311636178.2576.34.camel@schen9-DESK> <1311660013.2996.6.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1311668466.2355.12.camel@edumazet-HP-Compaq-6005-Pro-SFF-PC> <20110726090357.GA13013@infradead.org> <1311672994.2355.17.camel@edumazet-HP-Compaq-6005-Pro-SFF-PC> <1311780065.2356.18.camel@edumazet-HP-Compaq-6005-Pro-SFF-PC> <20110727204415.GA13308@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110727204415.GA13308@infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Btw, I wonder if you should micro-optimize things a bit further by > moving the unhashed checks from the deletion functions into the callers > and thus save a function call for each of them. If the caller is in the same file modern gcc is able to do that automatically if you're lucky enough ("partial inlining") I would not uglify the code for it. -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.