From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>
Subject: [PATCH 00/11] [v2] misc changes for kexec in pv-on-hvm
	guests
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 15:23:00 +0200
Message-ID: <20110728132300.248098023@aepfle.de>
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org



The following series implement kexec in a pv-on-hvm guest.
I send it here once more for further review before bothering lkml.

With this series doing kexec in a loop is now possible.


A fixed kexec-tools-2.0.2 package is required:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/kexec/2011-May/005026.html
However, as I just found out, xenfs unconditionally adds /proc/xen/capabilities
even for hvm guest.

So: how is a hvm guest supposed to be detected in 3.0?

Olaf