All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arno Wagner <arno@wagner.name>
To: dm-crypt@saout.de
Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] LUKS & TrueCrypt - Speed Test
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 07:20:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110729052018.GA10049@tansi.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E31F7C2.4050305@gmail.com>

Hi Jorge,

you can see that running the test several times gives you some 
appreciation for the variation in the measurement. Anyways,
this is what I would expect, i.e. TrueCrypt having a little
bit lower speed due to the userspace interface. 

Thanks for posting these!

Arno


On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 07:58:58PM -0400, Jorge F?bregas wrote:
> On 07/27/2011 07:18 PM, Jorge F?bregas wrote:
> > I decided to perform some tests on my Fedora 14 box.   This is not a
> > pro benchmark so be warned :)
> 
> Hi everyone,
> 
> I performed the tests again (twice for each test) but this time I
> formatted the LUKS partition using:
> 
> cryptsetup luksFormat -c aes-xts-plain -s 256 -h ripemd160 /dev/sdd1
> 
> ...so that I was more _similar_ to the TrueCrypt setup.  Also, between
> each test I run:
> 
> echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
> 
> Here are the new results for the same payload (143 GB of data):
> 
> ### TRUECRYPT ####
> 
> 1st round:
> real	105m39.547s
> user	28m17.667s
> sys	42m25.300s
> 
> 
> 2nd round:
> real	105m40.271s
> user	28m21.893s
> sys	42m19.672s
> 
> 
> ### LUKS ###
> 
> 1st round:
> real	104m33.901s
> user	27m41.362s
> sys	41m0.339s
> 
> 
> 2nd round:
> real	104m44.913s
> user	27m42.364s
> sys	40m57.655s
> 
> 
> Now as you may see, LUKS is roughly around 1 minute ahead (sytem-time)
> compared to TrueCrypt.  It appears the change in cipher operation mode
> definitely affected the results (thing I should have done on the first
> place).
> 
> Cheers and thank your for the feedback!
> Jorge
> _______________________________________________
> dm-crypt mailing list
> dm-crypt@saout.de
> http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt
> 

-- 
Arno Wagner, Dr. sc. techn., Dipl. Inform., CISSP -- Email: arno@wagner.name 
GnuPG:  ID: 1E25338F  FP: 0C30 5782 9D93 F785 E79C  0296 797F 6B50 1E25 338F
----
Cuddly UI's are the manifestation of wishful thinking. -- Dylan Evans

If it's in the news, don't worry about it.  The very definition of 
"news" is "something that hardly ever happens." -- Bruce Schneier 

  reply	other threads:[~2011-07-29  5:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-27 23:18 [dm-crypt] LUKS & TrueCrypt - Speed Test Jorge Fábregas
2011-07-28  5:11 ` Arno Wagner
2011-07-28 13:07   ` Jorge Fábregas
2011-07-28  7:40 ` Milan Broz
2011-07-28 13:20   ` Jorge Fábregas
2011-07-28 23:58 ` Jorge Fábregas
2011-07-29  5:20   ` Arno Wagner [this message]
2011-07-29  9:52     ` Roscoe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110729052018.GA10049@tansi.org \
    --to=arno@wagner.name \
    --cc=dm-crypt@saout.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.