From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Fix build of s3c64xx cpufreq driver for header change Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 11:08:51 -0400 Message-ID: <20110729150851.GA9156@redhat.com> References: <1311949618-919-1-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20110729144802.GB1422@redhat.com> <20110729150144.GC19118@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110729150144.GC19118@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Sender: cpufreq-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Mark Brown Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, Kukjin Kim On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 04:01:44PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 10:48:02AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 03:26:58PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > > Some header change has removed an implicit include of module.h, breaking > > > the build due to the use of THIS_MODULE. Fix that. > > > is this dependant on the module.h changes that just got merged in -next > > from Paul Gortmaker ? If so, it should probably get merged as part of that set. > > Possibly, but there were a bunch of other failures in the Samsung > specific stuff not related to module.h which appeared today. I did run > into another non-samsung module.h failure, though. Mostly I was just > surprised stuff like this was showing up so late in the merge window, I > didn't spend a lot of time investigating what broke. wait, confused. Were you building Linus' tree, or -next ? Dave