From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Fix build of s3c64xx cpufreq driver for header change Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 16:13:24 +0100 Message-ID: <20110729151324.GD19118@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1311949618-919-1-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20110729144802.GB1422@redhat.com> <20110729150144.GC19118@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20110729150851.GA9156@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110729150851.GA9156@redhat.com> Sender: cpufreq-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Dave Jones , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, Kukjin Kim On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:08:51AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 04:01:44PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > Possibly, but there were a bunch of other failures in the Samsung > > specific stuff not related to module.h which appeared today. I did run > > into another non-samsung module.h failure, though. Mostly I was just > > surprised stuff like this was showing up so late in the merge window, I > > didn't spend a lot of time investigating what broke. > wait, confused. Were you building Linus' tree, or -next ? -next (given that the merge window is still open it should be emptying out other than bug fixes...).