From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Toshiyuki Okajima <toshi.okajima@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext3: fix message in ext3_remount for rw-remount case
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 11:57:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110801095731.GI6522@quack.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E3675D6.3010201@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Mon 01-08-11 18:45:58, Toshiyuki Okajima wrote:
> (2011/08/01 17:45), Jan Kara wrote:
> >On Mon 01-08-11 13:54:51, Toshiyuki Okajima wrote:
> >>If there are some inodes in orphan list while a filesystem is being
> >>read-only mounted, we should recommend that pepole umount and then
> >>mount it when they try to remount with read-write. But the current
> >>message/comment recommends that they umount and then remount it.
> >>
> >>ext3_remount:
> >> /*
> >> * If we have an unprocessed orphan list hanging
> >> * around from a previously readonly bdev mount,
> >> * require a full umount/remount for now.
> >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >> */
> >> if (es->s_last_orphan) {
> >> printk(KERN_WARNING "EXT3-fs: %s: couldn't "
> >> "remount RDWR because of unprocessed "
> >> "orphan inode list. Please "
> >> "umount/remount instead.\n",
> >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >> sb->s_id);
>
> > OK, so how about using "umount& mount"? The '/' is what would confuse me
> OK. I modify it like your comment.
>
> umount/mount => umount & mount
Thanks.
> >the most... BTW, I guess you didn't really see this message in practice, did
> >you?
> No.
> I have seen this message in practice while quotacheck command was repeatedly
> executed per an hour.
Interesting. Are you able to reproduce this? Quotacheck does remount
read-only + remount read-write but you cannot really remount the filesystem
read-only when it has orphan inodes and so you should not see those when
you remount read-write again. Possibly there's race between remounting and
unlinking...
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-01 9:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-01 4:54 [PATCH] ext3: fix message in ext3_remount for rw-remount case Toshiyuki Okajima
2011-08-01 8:45 ` Jan Kara
2011-08-01 9:45 ` Toshiyuki Okajima
2011-08-01 9:57 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2011-08-02 9:14 ` Toshiyuki Okajima
2011-08-03 2:42 ` Toshiyuki Okajima
2011-08-03 9:57 ` Jan Kara
2011-08-03 13:25 ` Toshiyuki Okajima
2011-08-03 16:25 ` Jan Kara
2011-08-08 4:27 ` Toshiyuki Okajima
2011-08-08 12:48 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110801095731.GI6522@quack.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=toshi.okajima@jp.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.