From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] [v2] misc changes for kexec in
	pv-on-hvm guests
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 15:00:50 +0200
Message-ID: <20110801130050.GC9956@aepfle.de>
References: <20110728132300.248098023@aepfle.de>
	<CA57261F.1EB25%keir.xen@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CA57261F.1EB25%keir.xen@gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Keir Fraser <keir.xen@gmail.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Thu, Jul 28, Keir Fraser wrote:

> On 28/07/2011 14:23, "Olaf Hering" <olaf@aepfle.de> wrote:
> 
> > A fixed kexec-tools-2.0.2 package is required:
> > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/kexec/2011-May/005026.html
> > However, as I just found out, xenfs unconditionally adds
> > /proc/xen/capabilities
> > even for hvm guest.
> > 
> > So: how is a hvm guest supposed to be detected in 3.0?
> 
> Rip the moving parts from tools/misc/xen-detect.c. It does rely on hooking
> SIGILL if you want to safely probe for being a PV guest (uses a
> paravirtualised CPUID instruction that is normally an illegal instruction).

Thanks, I will work on a better kexec-tools patch to distinguish dom0
from a PVonHVM guest.

Olaf