From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: xfstests 073 regression
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2011 19:44:28 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110802114428.GA6014@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110801165242.GA18802@infradead.org>
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 12:52:42AM +0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> wb_check_background_flush is indeed what we're hitting.
That means s_umount is NOT held by another queued writeback work.
> See the trace output using a patch inspired by Curt's below:
>
> # tracer: nop
> #
> # TASK-PID CPU# TIMESTAMP FUNCTION
> # | | | | |
> <...>-4279 [000] 113.034052: writeback_grab_super_failed: bdi 7:0: sb_dev 0:0 nr_pages=9223372036854775807 sync_mode=0 kupdate=0 range_cyclic=1 background=1 reason=wb_check_background_flush
> <...>-4279 [000] 113.034052: writeback_grab_super_failed: bdi 7:0: sb_dev 0:0 nr_pages=9223372036854775807 sync_mode=0 kupdate=0 range_cyclic=1 background=1 reason=wb_check_background_flush
> <...>-4279 [000] 113.034052: writeback_grab_super_failed: bdi 7:0: sb_dev 0:0 nr_pages=9223372036854775807 sync_mode=0 kupdate=0 range_cyclic=1 background=1 reason=wb_check_background_flush
What's that bdi 7:0? And sb_dev=0:0, nr_pages=9223372036854775807=0x7fffffffffffffff.
All are indicating some special bdi/inode.
Thanks,
Fengguang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-02 11:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-28 16:41 xfstests 073 regression Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-29 14:21 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-07-30 13:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-31 9:09 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-07-31 11:05 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-07-31 11:28 ` Dave Chinner
2011-07-31 15:10 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-07-31 15:14 ` [GIT PULL] fix xfstests 073 regression for 3.1-rc1 Wu Fengguang
2011-07-31 23:47 ` xfstests 073 regression Dave Chinner
2011-08-01 0:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-08-01 1:28 ` Dave Chinner
2011-08-01 1:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-08-01 2:09 ` Dave Chinner
2011-08-01 2:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-08-01 5:52 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-01 16:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-08-01 11:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-08-01 16:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-08-02 11:44 ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
2011-08-02 12:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-08-02 12:04 ` Dave Chinner
2011-08-02 12:16 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-02 12:26 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-02 12:05 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-01 5:24 ` Wu Fengguang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110802114428.GA6014@localhost \
--to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.