From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ASoC: core: cache index fix Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 18:31:43 +0900 Message-ID: <20110803093140.GB30782@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <65EE16ACC360FA4D99C96DC085B3F7721F43AA@039-SN1MPN1-002.039d.mgd.msft.net> <65EE16ACC360FA4D99C96DC085B3F7721F443D@039-SN1MPN1-002.039d.mgd.msft.net> <65EE16ACC360FA4D99C96DC085B3F7721F45A8@039-SN1MPN1-002.039d.mgd.msft.net> <20110802154815.GE25884@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20110802164005.GI25884@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <65EE16ACC360FA4D99C96DC085B3F7721F4F43@039-SN1MPN1-002.039d.mgd.msft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from opensource2.wolfsonmicro.com (opensource.wolfsonmicro.com [80.75.67.52]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB5D81038EA for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 11:31:53 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <65EE16ACC360FA4D99C96DC085B3F7721F4F43@039-SN1MPN1-002.039d.mgd.msft.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Dong Aisheng-B29396 Cc: "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" , Takashi Iwai , "s.hauer@pengutronix.de" , "w.sang@pengutronix.de" , "lrg@ti.com" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 07:39:27AM +0000, Dong Aisheng-B29396 wrote: > Can we fix FLAT first since it is most used and let rbtree and LZO as before? Leaving rbtree and LZO alone is exactly what I've been saying! From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown) Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 18:31:43 +0900 Subject: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/1] ASoC: core: cache index fix In-Reply-To: <65EE16ACC360FA4D99C96DC085B3F7721F4F43@039-SN1MPN1-002.039d.mgd.msft.net> References: <65EE16ACC360FA4D99C96DC085B3F7721F43AA@039-SN1MPN1-002.039d.mgd.msft.net> <65EE16ACC360FA4D99C96DC085B3F7721F443D@039-SN1MPN1-002.039d.mgd.msft.net> <65EE16ACC360FA4D99C96DC085B3F7721F45A8@039-SN1MPN1-002.039d.mgd.msft.net> <20110802154815.GE25884@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20110802164005.GI25884@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <65EE16ACC360FA4D99C96DC085B3F7721F4F43@039-SN1MPN1-002.039d.mgd.msft.net> Message-ID: <20110803093140.GB30782@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 07:39:27AM +0000, Dong Aisheng-B29396 wrote: > Can we fix FLAT first since it is most used and let rbtree and LZO as before? Leaving rbtree and LZO alone is exactly what I've been saying!