From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Joe Jin <joe.jin@oracle.com>
Cc: Daniel Stodden <daniel.stodden@citrix.com>,
Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>, Annie Li <annie.li@oracle.com>,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@eu.citrix.com>,
Kurt C Hackel <KURT.HACKEL@oracle.com>,
Greg Marsden <greg.marsden@oracle.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 0/3] xen-blkback: refactor vbd remove/disconnect.
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 17:49:48 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110803214947.GA12168@dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E38E4A2.3070003@oracle.com>
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 02:03:14PM +0800, Joe Jin wrote:
> This patchset is a backport and original patch author is Daniel Stodden:
> http://xenbits.xen.org/hg/XCP/linux-2.6.32.pq.hg/file/tip/CA-7672-blkback-shutdown.patch
>
> Initial issue:
> When we do block device attach/detach test with below steps, umount hang
> in guest and the guest unable to shutdown:
So the patchset looks good and it fixes the guest hanging.. but
>
> 1. start guest with the latest kernel.
> 2. attach new block device by xm block-attach in Dom0
So I think your patch while it fixes this problem it introduces a bug:
I did this in Dom0:
18:10:23 # 5 :~/
> xm block-attach 1 phy:/dev/sda xvda w
and did _not_ attach the disk in the guest. Then I did
18:10:35 # 6 :~/
> xm block-list 1
Vdev BE handle state evt-ch ring-ref BE-path
51712 0 0 4 18 770 /local/domain/0/backend/vbd/1/51712
18:10:39 # 7 :~/
> xm block-detach 1 51712
18:10:46 # 8 :~/
> xm block-list 1
If I try the same sequence of events with your patch, I get this:
1:28:06 # 1 :~/
> xm list
Name ID Mem VCPUs State Time(s)
Domain-0 0 1500 4 r----- 1246.6
sda 2 2048 2 -b---- 1034.7
sdb 6 2048 2 -b---- 3.4
21:28:09 # 2 :~/
> xm block-list 6
21:28:22 # 4 :~/
> xm block-attach 6 phy:/dev/sdb xvda w
[did not do anything in the guest]
21:28:33 # 5 :~/
> xm block-list 6
Vdev BE handle state evt-ch ring-ref BE-path
51712 0 0 4 18 770 /local/domain/0/backend/vbd/6/51712
21:28:37 # 6 :~/
> xm block-detach 6 51712
Error: Device 51712 (vbd) could not be disconnected.
Usage: xm block-detach <Domain> <DevId> [-f|--force]
Destroy a domain's virtual block device.
21:30:30 # 7 :~/
Any ideas?
> 3. mount new disk in guest
> 4. execute xm block-detach to detach the block device in dom0 until timeout
> 5. try to unmount the disk in guest, umount hung. at here, any IOs to the
> device will hang.
>
> Root cause:
> This caused by 'xm block-detach' in Dom0 set backend device's state to
> 'XenbusStateClosing', frontend received the notification and
> blkfront_closing() be called, at the moment, the disk still using by guest,
> so frontend refused to close. In the blkfront_closing(), frontend send a
> notification to backend said that the its state switched to 'Closing', when
> backend got the event, it will disconnect from real device, at here any IO
> request will be stuck, even tried to release the disk by umount.
>
> So this may fix either frontend or backend, I have send a fix for frontend:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/7/8/159
> Ian think we should fix it from backend and he pointed out Daniel Stodden have
> submitted a patch(see above link) for xen-blkback, I tried it and it works
> well.
>
> Changes:
> v2:
> - Reformat code style.
> - Per Knoard suggestions, change some int defines to bool.
>
> drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c | 10 +--
> drivers/block/xen-blkback/common.h | 5 +
> drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c | 203 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 3 files changed, 192 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-03 21:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-03 6:03 [PATCH -v2 0/3] xen-blkback: refactor vbd remove/disconnect Joe Jin
2011-08-03 6:03 ` Joe Jin
2011-08-03 6:05 ` [PATCH -v2 1/3] xen-blkback: add remove_requested to xen_blkif and some declares Joe Jin
2011-08-03 6:05 ` Joe Jin
2011-08-03 6:06 ` [PATCH -v2 2/3] xen-blkback: repleace check kthread_should_stop() to remove_requested in xen_blkif_schedule() loop Joe Jin
2011-08-03 6:06 ` Joe Jin
2011-08-03 6:07 ` [PATCH -v2 3/3] xen-blkback: refactor vbd remove/disconnect Joe Jin
2011-08-03 21:49 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2011-08-04 6:56 ` [PATCH -v2 0/3] " Joe Jin
2011-08-04 6:56 ` Joe Jin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110803214947.GA12168@dumpdata.com \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=KURT.HACKEL@oracle.com \
--cc=annie.li@oracle.com \
--cc=daniel.stodden@citrix.com \
--cc=greg.marsden@oracle.com \
--cc=jaxboe@fusionio.com \
--cc=joe.jin@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.