From: davidb@codeaurora.org (David Brown)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: experience with the new arm-soc workflow (Was: Re: [Ksummit-2011-discuss] ARM Maintainers workshop at Kernel Summit) 2011
Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2011 21:11:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110807041124.GA6410@huya.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHXqBF+BAdNo3NB9gk0o_aTHUxyQRHw_AvM5ok9zn2yk4NsRZw@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Aug 07, 2011 at 12:13:48AM +0200, Micha? Miros?aw wrote:
> I, as another contributor, share Uwe's point of view. The problem with
> cleanups vs features is that either usually depends on the other.
> Fixes are a different beasts and they usually go in asynchronously
> (and quicker) to development changes. The split fixes/development
> works well in networking area (net and net-next trees).
Maybe we are thinking about two different kinds of cleanups. Cleanups
that would be closely associated with a new feature do make sense to
me to keep together. This is the kind of thing where code is cleaned
up in order to make it easier/cleaner to add the new code. I don't
think this makes sense to have in another branch.
But, there is also a lot of code going on now that is just cleaning
things up, and it makes sense for this to be in a separate branch.
David
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-07 4:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-06 6:44 ARM Maintainers workshop at Kernel Summit 2011 Grant Likely
2011-08-06 13:59 ` [Ksummit-2011-discuss] " Olof Johansson
2011-08-06 21:29 ` experience with the new arm-soc workflow (Was: Re: [Ksummit-2011-discuss] ARM Maintainers workshop at Kernel Summit) 2011 Uwe Kleine-König
2011-08-06 21:55 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-08-06 22:13 ` Michał Mirosław
2011-08-07 4:11 ` David Brown [this message]
2011-08-09 15:07 ` [Ksummit-2011-discuss] experience with the new arm-soc workflow (Was: " Steven Rostedt
2011-08-09 15:34 ` Mark Brown
2011-08-09 15:41 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-08-09 15:57 ` Mark Brown
2011-08-11 13:47 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-08-09 14:15 ` ARM Maintainers workshop at Kernel Summit 2011 Sascha Hauer
2011-08-11 9:46 ` Marek Vasut
2011-08-11 13:32 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110807041124.GA6410@huya.qualcomm.com \
--to=davidb@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.