From: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@openwall.com>
To: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com
Subject: [kernel-hardening] Re: procfs {tid,tgid,attr}_allowed mount options
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 14:02:27 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110810100227.GA3507@albatros> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110804112331.GA2563@albatros>
Solar,
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 15:23 +0400, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote:
> New version. Cleanups/fixes here and there.
One question: do we really need gid= option? The only user I know is
identd, but does anybody use it nowadays?
With gid= I see 2 drawbacks:
1) Code becomes worse because of additional permission checks.
2) From the upstream's point of view it is very limited and unextendable
feature.
So, I'd go further without gid=, at least for the beginning.
Thanks,
--
Vasiliy Kulikov
http://www.openwall.com - bringing security into open computing environments
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-10 10:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20110603191153.GB514@openwall.com>
2011-06-04 5:47 ` [kernel-hardening] Re: procfs mount options Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-06-04 13:20 ` [kernel-hardening] " Solar Designer
2011-06-04 20:09 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-06-04 20:59 ` Solar Designer
2011-06-05 18:24 ` [kernel-hardening] [RFC v1] " Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-06-05 19:26 ` Solar Designer
2011-06-05 19:47 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-06-05 20:10 ` Solar Designer
2011-06-06 18:08 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-06-06 18:33 ` Solar Designer
2011-06-08 17:23 ` [kernel-hardening] [RFC v2] " Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-06-08 17:43 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-06-12 2:39 ` Solar Designer
2011-07-24 18:55 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
[not found] ` <20110724185036.GC3510@albatros>
2011-07-26 14:50 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-07-29 17:47 ` [kernel-hardening] procfs {tid,tgid,attr}_allowed " Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-04 11:23 ` [kernel-hardening] " Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-10 10:02 ` Vasiliy Kulikov [this message]
2011-08-10 11:22 ` [kernel-hardening] " Solar Designer
2011-08-10 11:25 ` Solar Designer
2011-08-10 12:04 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-10 13:34 ` Solar Designer
2011-08-12 18:14 ` Simon Marechal
2011-06-06 19:20 ` [kernel-hardening] [RFC v1] procfs " Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-06-05 19:17 ` [kernel-hardening] " Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-06-05 19:40 ` Solar Designer
2011-06-05 19:53 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-06-05 18:36 ` [kernel-hardening] Re: [owl-dev] " Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-06-05 18:47 ` [kernel-hardening] " Solar Designer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110810100227.GA3507@albatros \
--to=segoon@openwall.com \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.