From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND][PATCH 0/5] Support for the TS-5500 board
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 10:06:29 -0400
Message-ID: <20110810100629.715c3bb7@v0nbox>
References: <1311887450-22235-1-git-send-email-vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>
	<20110809233208.1a71122e@lenov0n>
	<4E421CD8.3090606@canonical.com>
	<CAHR064hamS0gHqQR5a5UAanN89CzzW94sjW6SB3=8MAcf6pkMg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Return-path: <platform-driver-x86-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail.savoirfairelinux.com ([209.172.62.77]:40208 "EHLO
	mail.savoirfairelinux.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751222Ab1HJOGi convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT
	<rfc822;platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 10 Aug 2011 10:06:38 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAHR064hamS0gHqQR5a5UAanN89CzzW94sjW6SB3=8MAcf6pkMg@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: platform-driver-x86-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <platform-driver-x86.vger.kernel.org>
To: Corentin Chary <corentin.chary@gmail.com>
Cc: Ike Panhc <ike.pan@canonical.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mjg@redhat.com, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org

Hi,

Le Wed, 10 Aug 2011 08:18:28 +0200,
Corentin Chary <corentin.chary@gmail.com> a =E9crit :

> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Ike Panhc <ike.pan@canonical.com>
> wrote:
> > I think platform-driver-x86 may not be the best mailing list for
> > your patches.
> >
> > Please try to use scripts/get_maintainer.pl and it can tell you who
> > you shall ask for reviewing.
>=20
> Like Ike said, this is the mainling list for drivers/platform/x86, no=
t
> arch/x86, and running get_maintainer.pl on your patchs will give you
> the rights people to CC.

Thanks for this information, it can be useful indeed.

>=20
> And btw, I'm not sure we really want to put all these drivers in
> arch/x86/platform/ts5500/ a re-create the arm driver mess.
> drivers/leds/, drivers/gpio/  and drivers/mtd/ are probably a best
> choice.

In fact, this set of patches is a rewrite of the first RFC set, where
we discussed that arch/x86/platform/ could be a good place, as the
TS-5500 is a specific platform with its platform devices (the
corresponding thread is here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/5/3/60).

Regards,
Vivien.