From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: network boot always enabled with 0.15.0
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 12:38:56 +0300
Message-ID: <20110811093856.GV4404@redhat.com>
References: <24E144B8C0207547AD09C467A8259F7537776084@lisa.maurer-it.com>
 <20110811090522.GU4404@redhat.com>
 <24E144B8C0207547AD09C467A8259F75377760F0@lisa.maurer-it.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: "kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
To: Dietmar Maurer <dietmar@proxmox.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:10815 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1754402Ab1HKJjA (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 11 Aug 2011 05:39:00 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <24E144B8C0207547AD09C467A8259F75377760F0@lisa.maurer-it.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 09:12:42AM +0000, Dietmar Maurer wrote:
> > Does it tries it only when c & d are not bootable or always?
> 
> Only if c &d are not bootable. 
> 
Then it is expected (as in "this is how code works currently"). Why
would you want to disable network boot if other method failed?

--
			Gleb.