From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: [stable] [uclinux-dist-devel] [PATCH 3.0]ASoC: ad193x: add spi_hw_read, fix sysclk and register definition Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 07:17:37 -0700 Message-ID: <20110811141737.GA14832@kroah.com> References: <20110811133432.GA6067@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from out3.smtp.messagingengine.com (out3.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8FC724427 for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 16:18:43 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Takashi Iwai Cc: Scott Jiang , Mark Brown , "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" , "uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org" , "Zhang, Sonic" , "stable@kernel.org" List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 03:43:09PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > At Thu, 11 Aug 2011 06:34:32 -0700, > Greg KH wrote: > > > > On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 04:52:18AM -0400, Zhang, Sonic wrote: > > > > > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > > >From: uclinux-dist-devel-bounces@blackfin.uclinux.org > > > >[mailto:uclinux-dist-devel-bounces@blackfin.uclinux.org] On > > > >Behalf Of Scott Jiang > > > >Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2011 4:27 PM > > > >To: Greg Kroah-Hartman > > > >Cc: uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org; > > > >alsa-devel@alsa-project.org; stable@kernel.org > > > >Subject: [uclinux-dist-devel] [alsa-devel][PATCH 3.0]ASoC: > > > >ad193x: add spi_hw_read, fix sysclk and register definition > > > > > > > >asoc cache layer can't support this kind of spi registers, so > > > >bypass cache and read regiters directly > > > > > > > > > > This patch is against stable kernel 3.0 only, the ASOC framework in kernel 3.1 and later are different. > > > > Then I need some acks from all of the relevant maintainers before I can > > apply it to the stable kernel tree. > > > > Is there a corrisponding patch in Linus's tree that does the same thing > > already? > > Not yet, even neither in sound git tree. > > We're handling the same patch now for 3.1. As the patch is likely > applicable to 3.0 as is, putting Cc to stable would be enough, I > suppose. > > > Scott, the patch to stable kernel must have been applied to the > upstream tree beforehand. Read Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt. Ok, now dropped from my stable "to-apply" mbox. I'll wait for the real patch to hit Linus's tree. greg k-h