From: David Aguilar <davvid@gmail.com>
To: Sebastian Schuberth <sschuberth@gmail.com>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>,
Tanguy Ortolo <tanguy+debian@ortolo.eu>,
Charles Bailey <charles@hashpling.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] difftool--helper: Make style consistent with git
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 02:08:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110818090810.GA15416@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHGBnuPRsh0WDVSFr0X1Y+nb=94pJVv8=evFQCjdcd_y9ux97A@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 09:49:33AM +0200, Sebastian Schuberth wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 09:23, David Aguilar <davvid@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Use the predominant conditional style where "then" appears
> > alone on the line after the test expression.
>
> I support your effort to unify the style, but for my personal taste it
> has gone the wrong way :-) Even if "then" on its own line was the
> predominant style in the merge scripts, I would have voted for putting
> all "then" in the same line as "if" as I find this easier to read and
> comprehend. But then again it's obvious that such a change would
> polarize ;-)
>
> --
> Sebastian Schuberth
I am fine reworking it either way.
There's not a specific note about it in
Documentation/CodingStyle.
If someone wants to make the final call I can patch the docs
and rework these patches as needed.
Thanks,
--
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-18 9:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-18 7:23 [PATCH 0/4] Refactor git-mergetool--lib.sh David Aguilar
2011-08-18 7:23 ` [PATCH 1/4] difftool--helper: Make style consistent with git David Aguilar
2011-08-18 7:49 ` Sebastian Schuberth
2011-08-18 9:08 ` David Aguilar [this message]
2011-08-18 17:31 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-18 7:23 ` [PATCH 2/4] mergetool--lib: " David Aguilar
2011-08-18 7:23 ` [PATCH 3/4] mergetool--lib: Refactor tools into separate files David Aguilar
2011-10-09 9:17 ` [PATCH da/difftool-mergtool-refactor] Makefile: fix permissions of mergetools/ checked out with permissive umask Jonathan Nieder
2011-10-09 11:43 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-10-09 18:26 ` David Aguilar
2011-10-09 21:47 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-10-11 0:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-18 7:23 ` [PATCH 4/4] mergetools/meld: Use '--output' when available David Aguilar
2011-08-18 8:13 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-08-18 9:24 ` David Aguilar
2011-08-19 9:14 ` [PATCH v2 " David Aguilar
2011-08-19 22:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-18 7:57 ` [PATCH 0/4] Refactor git-mergetool--lib.sh Sebastian Schuberth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110818090810.GA15416@gmail.com \
--to=davvid@gmail.com \
--cc=charles@hashpling.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
--cc=sschuberth@gmail.com \
--cc=tanguy+debian@ortolo.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.