From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from fieldses.org ([174.143.236.118]:59862 "EHLO fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755637Ab1HSTdB (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Aug 2011 15:33:01 -0400 Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 15:32:59 -0400 To: Stanislav Kinsbursky Cc: Chuck Lever , Pavel Emelianov , "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: NFS client virtualization plan Message-ID: <20110819193259.GC1641@fieldses.org> References: <4E4A4DB1.2090105@parallels.com> <67028AE2-C41D-4D9E-9AB9-81433AD196A2@oracle.com> <4E4E30E8.2080704@parallels.com> <4E4E9B8C.8050000@parallels.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <4E4E9B8C.8050000@parallels.com> From: "J. Bruce Fields" Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 09:21:16PM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote: > Actually, yes, I do. Thanks for notice. > Kernel NSM monitor routines will be virtualized. > For idmapd and gssd rpc_pipefs virtualization is required. > I wasn't going to virtualize rpc_pipefs for now - it was planned to be a part of NFS server virtualization, which is planned to be done after NFS client virtualization. You'll need rpc_pipefs for gssd and the old idmapd. Also the new idmapper uses request_key. I think there's a little discussion about this in the archives. --b.