From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 02/11] PM: extend PM QoS with per-device wake-up constraints Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 18:34:34 +0200 Message-ID: <201108201834.34741.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <20110820062543.GA5011@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20110820152959.GA22424@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:54591 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753198Ab1HTQcu (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Aug 2011 12:32:50 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20110820152959.GA22424@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Brown Cc: Alan Stern , Linux PM mailing list , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Jean Pihet , markgross@thegnar.org On Saturday, August 20, 2011, Mark Brown wrote: > On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 09:48:25AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > > > No, I as wasking about driver- and subsystem-specific interfaces to > > userspace that translate into things users are already doing. Kevin's > > example was a touchscreen (although that was really an example of > > setting a power usage level, not a latency constraint). Do you have > > any others? > > Any sort of media streaming would be an obvious example - the > application picks the amount of data it buffers and how often it's > notified of progress depending on the usage which then controls how > quickly the system needs to handle things. Well, what about other types of devices?