From: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@openwall.com>
To: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [kernel-hardening] kmalloc() nofail allocations
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 14:05:12 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110822100512.GA2878@albatros> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110822095354.GA13836@openwall.com>
Solar,
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 13:53 +0400, Solar Designer wrote:
> However, is there any difference for the caller between kmalloc()
> looping until success (and thus only returning on success) and it
> OOM-killing the current process (and thus also only returning on
> success)? Or does this question somehow not apply to the problem you
> discovered?
The "cannot fail" loop stops if the current task is marked as
to-be-killed-by-oom-killer. OOM killer doesn't immediately kill the
task, the task exits itself after the exit from kernel mode and a
scheduler step (AFAIU).
So, AFAICS, the loop is executed only if:
1) Appropriate flags are passed (no NOWAIT, etc.), sane NUMA node list is
passed (e.g. not GFP_THISNODE and node list without current node).
2) Size is not big (less than PAGE_SIZE << 3).
3) Debugging allocation failure injection is either off or has a
min size more than the current allocation size.
4) OOM killer didn't mark the task with TIF_MEMDIE.
Thanks,
--
Vasiliy
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-22 10:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-17 19:15 [kernel-hardening] kmalloc() nofail allocations Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-20 14:27 ` [kernel-hardening] " Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-20 16:31 ` [kernel-hardening] " Solar Designer
2011-08-22 9:24 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-22 9:38 ` Solar Designer
2011-08-22 9:45 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-22 9:53 ` Solar Designer
2011-08-22 10:05 ` Vasiliy Kulikov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110822100512.GA2878@albatros \
--to=segoon@openwall.com \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.