From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: "Moritz Mühlenhoff" <muehlenhoff@univention.de>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: Re: Avoiding the use of test signing for the GPLPV drivers for 64 bit Windows
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 09:40:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110822134054.GE8944@dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201108221202.22148.muehlenhoff@univention.de>
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 12:02:21PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> Hi,
> we've been investigating ways to deploy the GPLPV drivers for Windows 2008
> w/o the need to activate the test mode (not for strictly technical reasons;
> the drivers work fine but some third party applications void their warranty
> if run under test mode and the mandatory note on the desktop may lead to user
> confusion).
>
> I found a mailing lis thread, where a similar scenario has been discussed
> for the libusb drivers. The relevant bits start here:
> http://libusb.6.n5.nabble.com/WHQL-Testing-Agreement-and-GPLv3-conflicts-td3335877.html
>
> Microsoft doesn't permit GPLv2 und GPLv3 drivers in their Windows Logo
> Program (which is a prerequisite for WHQL certification). However in this
> thread someone from Wind River contacted Microsoft and they pointed to the
> possibility to sign the driver with a certificate issues by a CA instead of
> the WHQL signatures (the full document is attached to the second link):
>
> http://libusb.6.n5.nabble.com/WHQL-Testing-Agreement-and-GPLv3-conflicts-tp335877p3337666.html
> http://libusb.6.n5.nabble.com/WHQL-Testing-Agreement-and-GPLv3-conflicts-tp3335877p3341534.html
>
> In my understanding this certificate would be a SPC certificate
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff552299%28v=vs.85%29.aspx
> http://www.certum.eu/certum/cert,offer_software_publisher.xml
>
> Later on in the thread it's being confirmed that this procedure allows the
> installation of the driver w/o popups and activation of the test mode:
> http://libusb.6.n5.nabble.com/WHQL-Testing-Agreement-and-GPLv3-conflicts-tp3335877p3339827.html
>
> Is anyone already building and signing the GPLPV drivers with that procedure?
Hm sounds like that is exactly what the Red Hat folks had done:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=virt/kvm/kvm-guest-drivers-windows.git;a=blob;f=VirtIO/LICENSE;h=808dba85afaccc31dac21863d2cd4dd4a3b7d29f;hb=HEAD
>
> Cheers,
> Moritz
> --
> Moritz Mühlenhoff muehlenhoff@univention.de
> Open Source Software Engineer and Consultant
> Univention GmbH Linux for Your Business fon: +49 421 22 232- 0
> Mary-Somerville-Str.1 28359 Bremen fax: +49 421 22 232-99
> http://www.univention.de
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-22 13:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-22 10:02 Avoiding the use of test signing for the GPLPV drivers for 64 bit Windows Moritz Mühlenhoff
2011-08-22 13:40 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110822134054.GE8944@dumpdata.com \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=muehlenhoff@univention.de \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.