From: Jim Rees <rees@umich.edu>
To: paul.szabo@sydney.edu.au
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Please support NSF squashing multiple groups
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 12:14:13 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110822161413.GE2477@merit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201108190032.p7J0W3ZX030679@bari.maths.usyd.edu.au>
Paul, it's good to hear from you. Been about 12 years.
AUTH_SYS provides what some people call "pretend security." The server
enforces a security policy based on user and group IDs. But it only
pretends to enforce the policy, because it allows clients to break the rules
if they want.
Some people claim this is useless, and AUTH_SYS should go away, to be
replaced by "none" or "kerberos." I disagree. It's useful for preventing
mistakes among a group of users who trust each other but sometimes get
sloppy. My home network would be a good example. A compute cluster might
be another.
I do find root_squash useful but I'm not sure there's much point in adding
more squash options. For one thing it might lull people into thinking
they're getting something more than just pretend security. If you have
users who might try to break in to a machine by setting setgid bits, then
AUTH_SYS is not for you.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-22 16:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-19 0:32 Please support NSF squashing multiple groups paul.szabo
2011-08-19 1:05 ` NeilBrown
2011-08-19 2:10 ` paul.szabo
2011-08-19 19:19 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-08-19 22:06 ` paul.szabo
2011-08-19 22:15 ` Andy Adamson
2011-08-19 22:35 ` paul.szabo
2011-08-19 23:45 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-08-20 0:19 ` NeilBrown
2011-08-22 14:23 ` Andy Adamson
2011-08-19 19:29 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-08-19 22:21 ` paul.szabo
2011-08-22 16:14 ` Jim Rees [this message]
[not found] ` <20110822161413.GE2477-8f4Pc2RrbJmHXe+LvDLADg@public.gmane.org>
2011-08-22 21:05 ` paul.szabo-E0wInbZyfUpWG/WdbR7gnQ
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-09-20 22:48 paul.szabo
2011-09-20 23:05 ` Trond Myklebust
2011-09-20 23:29 ` paul.szabo
2011-09-20 23:38 ` Myklebust, Trond
2011-09-21 0:09 ` paul.szabo
2011-09-21 4:16 ` Myklebust, Trond
2011-09-21 5:38 ` paul.szabo
2011-09-20 23:47 ` Myklebust, Trond
2011-09-30 4:08 paul.szabo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110822161413.GE2477@merit.edu \
--to=rees@umich.edu \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul.szabo@sydney.edu.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.