From: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@elte.hu, emunson@mgebm.net,
vweaver1@eecs.utk.edu
Subject: [PATCH] perf_event: fix broken calc_timer_values()
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 14:41:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110829124112.GA4828@quad> (raw)
We detected a serious issue with PERF_SAMPLE_READ and
timing information when events were being multiplexing.
Samples would have time_running > time_enabled. That
was easy to reproduce with a libpfm4 example (ran 3
times to cause multiplexing on Core 2):
$ syst_smpl -e uops_retired:freq=1 &
$ syst_smpl -e uops_retired:freq=1 &
$ syst_smpl -e uops_retired:freq=1 &
IIP:0x0000000040062d ... PERIOD:2355332948 ENA=40144625315 RUN=60014875184
syst_smpl: WARNING: time_running > time_enabled
63277537998 uops_retired:freq=1 , scaled
The bug was not present in kernel up to 3.0. It turns
out the bug was introduced by the following commit:
commit c4794295917ebeda8013b6cb9c8d71ab4f74a1fa
Author: Eric B Munson <emunson@mgebm.net>
Date: Thu Jun 23 16:34:38 2011 -0400
events: Move lockless timer calculation into helper function
The parameters of the function got reversed yet the call sites
were not updated to reflect the change. That lead to time_running
and time_enabled being swapped. That had no effect when there was
no multiplexing because in that case time_running = time_enabled
but it would show up in any other scenario.
Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
---
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index adc3ef3..6bacaee 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -3354,8 +3354,8 @@ static int perf_event_index(struct perf_event *event)
}
static void calc_timer_values(struct perf_event *event,
- u64 *running,
- u64 *enabled)
+ u64 *enabled,
+ u64 *running)
{
u64 now, ctx_time;
next reply other threads:[~2011-08-29 12:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-29 12:41 Stephane Eranian [this message]
2011-08-29 12:53 ` [PATCH] perf_event: fix broken calc_timer_values() Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-29 13:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110829124112.GA4828@quad \
--to=eranian@google.com \
--cc=emunson@mgebm.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=vweaver1@eecs.utk.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.