From: Bryan Jacobs <bjacobs@woti.com>
To: Sam Vilain <sam@vilain.net>
Cc: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [spf:guess] Re: [PATCH] Teach dcommit --mergeinfo to handle multiple lines
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 16:51:09 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110831165109.0ca6373f@robyn.woti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E5E9CFB.4060600@vilain.net>
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 13:43:39 -0700
Sam Vilain <sam@vilain.net> wrote:
> On 8/31/11 1:21 PM, Eric Wong wrote:
> >> --- a/Documentation/git-svn.txt
> >> +++ b/Documentation/git-svn.txt
> >> @@ -211,8 +211,9 @@ discouraged.
> >> Add the given merge information during the dcommit
> >> (e.g. `--mergeinfo="/branches/foo:1-10"`). All svn
> >> server versions can store this information (as a property), and
> >> svn clients starting from
> >> - version 1.5 can make use of it. 'git svn' currently does
> >> not use it
> >> - and does not set it automatically.
> >> + version 1.5 can make use of it. To specify merge
> >> information from multiple
> >> + branches, use a single space character between the
> >> branches
> >> + (`--mergeinfo="/branches/foo:1-10 /branches/bar:3,5-6,8"`)
>
> This interface seems regrettably stupid. Like, do I need to consider
> the existing revisions that are already listed in the property? Is
> it really impossible to derive the changes that were merged and
> generate the list automatically?
Nope, it's possible. I didn't create the original --mergeinfo
interface. I was very surprised when I first discovered it clobbered
instead of integrating - it's easy to nuke your SVN repo's ability to
merge with one careless use of this option. See below.
> But so long as it makes something previously impossible possible, it
> is a good change - my feeling is that it should be called something
> like --mergeinfo-raw or --mergeinfo-set to leave room for a possible
> --mergeinfo-add which knows how the lists work and adds them (which
> is what I'd expect a plain --mergeinfo switch to do).
I completely agree. I think there should at least be a
--mergeinfo-update which fetches the current revision, merges that with
the provided set using the branch paths as keys (and compacts using
svn:mergeinfo rules), and sets the property to the final result.
I actually do this currently with external scripts, which is why I
wanted to make --mergeinfo capable of delivering my final payload. It
would make my life easier if all the logic were part of git-svn instead.
That said, this change is really small. That change would be larger.
So I submitted this first.
> Sam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-31 20:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-31 16:48 [PATCH] Teach dcommit --mergeinfo to handle multiple lines Bryan Jacobs
2011-08-31 20:21 ` Eric Wong
2011-08-31 20:43 ` [spf:guess] " Sam Vilain
2011-08-31 20:51 ` Bryan Jacobs [this message]
2011-08-31 22:15 ` [spf:guess,iffy] " Sam Vilain
2011-09-01 1:37 ` Eric Wong
2011-09-01 4:40 ` [spf:guess] " Sam Vilain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110831165109.0ca6373f@robyn.woti.com \
--to=bjacobs@woti.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=normalperson@yhbt.net \
--cc=sam@vilain.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.