Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Add support for r6040 NIC

["Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>]

On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 09:12:06PM +0200, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 01:48:34PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > On 08/31/2011 12:59 PM, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:
> > >On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:06:11AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > >>On 08/31/2011 09:35 AM, malc wrote:
> > >>>On Wed, 31 Aug 2011, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>>Upper case field names are not okay.  If you think coding style isn't clear,
> > >>>>that's a bug in coding style.
> > >>>
> > >>>Sez hu? Coding style is garbage that should be thrown out of the window.
> > >>>As for looking, yeah, i'm looking at usb with it's lovely hungarian
> > >>>fields, should we stampede to "fix" it?
> > >>>
> > >>>If the one who's going to maintain the code is fine with whatever naming
> > >>>is used so be it.
> > >>
> > >>No.  That's how we got into the coding style mess we're in in the
> > >>first place.
> > >
> > >TBH, the codingstyle in QEMU is the least of "problems" we are facing.
> > >We've got lack of documentation, lack of tests, lack of contributors,
> > >etc, etc. IMO, those bring codingstyle issues into the pretty much
> > >neglectable space.
> > 
> > I don't think we lack contributors.  Documentation and tests are
> > really about discipline.  If we can't even be bothered to maintain
> > consistency in variable naming, do you really expected that we can
> > be disciplined in writing documentation and tests?
> 
> Yes I do. It's not white and black, it's not about making the code
> completely inconsistent or 100 consistent. It's about find a level
> of consistency that is acceptable and doesn't cost too much to
> maintain.

Now if that's my opinion, then the 99999 dollar question is:
why am I wasting so much time on discusing it?

And btw Bifferos, don't worry. Not all patches you contribute will cause
this much controversy :)

Cheers