All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
To: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: Implement support for the RH bit
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 20:45:28 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110901174528.GA26451@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1314893135-3839-1-git-send-email-levinsasha928@gmail.com>

On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 07:05:35PM +0300, Sasha Levin wrote:
> The RH bit exists in the message address register (lower 32 bits of
> the address).
> 
> The bit indicates whether the message should go to the processor which was
> indicated in the destination ID bits, or whether it should go to the
> processor running at the lowest priority.
> 
> Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c      |   17 +++++++++++++++--
>  include/linux/kvm_types.h |    1 +
>  virt/kvm/ioapic.h         |    2 +-
>  virt/kvm/irq_comm.c       |   14 +++++++++++---
>  4 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> index 57dcbd4..3347f9f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
>  #include <asm/page.h>
>  #include <asm/current.h>
>  #include <asm/apicdef.h>
> +#include <asm/msidef.h>
>  #include <linux/atomic.h>
>  #include "kvm_cache_regs.h"
>  #include "irq.h"
> @@ -325,7 +326,7 @@ int kvm_apic_match_logical_addr(struct kvm_lapic *apic, u8 mda)
>  }
>  
>  int kvm_apic_match_dest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_lapic *source,
> -			   int short_hand, int dest, int dest_mode)
> +			   int short_hand, int dest, int dest_mode, int rh)
>  {
>  	int result = 0;
>  	struct kvm_lapic *target = vcpu->arch.apic;
> @@ -335,9 +336,21 @@ int kvm_apic_match_dest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_lapic *source,
>  		   target, source, dest, dest_mode, short_hand);
>  
>  	ASSERT(target);
> +
> +	/* If RH bit is not set, use addressing mode from ICR */
> +	if (rh == 0) {
> +		u32 icr_low = apic_get_reg(target, APIC_ICR);
> +
> +		dest_mode = icr_low & APIC_DEST_MASK;

Why is that? This function is called for messages generated by
ioapic/ipi/msi. In all those cases destination mode does not depend on
the content of icr_low register in the destination processor. This
function gets correct dest_mode as a parameter.

> +
> +		/* dest apic can't be 0xff if targeting specific processor */
> +		BUG_ON(dest_mode == MSI_ADDR_DEST_MODE_PHYSICAL &&
> +			(u8)dest == 0xff);
Can't this be triggered by a guest?

> +	}
> +
>  	switch (short_hand) {
>  	case APIC_DEST_NOSHORT:
> -		if (dest_mode == 0)
> +		if (dest_mode == MSI_ADDR_DEST_MODE_PHYSICAL)
This is apic code, why MSI defines?

>  			/* Physical mode. */
>  			result = kvm_apic_match_physical_addr(target, dest);
>  		else
> diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_types.h b/include/linux/kvm_types.h
> index fa7cc72..55d4d9a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kvm_types.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kvm_types.h
> @@ -65,6 +65,7 @@ struct kvm_lapic_irq {
>  	u32 trig_mode;
>  	u32 shorthand;
>  	u32 dest_id;
> +	u32 redir_hint;
>  };
>  
>  struct gfn_to_hva_cache {
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/ioapic.h b/virt/kvm/ioapic.h
> index 0b190c3..fd3bb64 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/ioapic.h
> +++ b/virt/kvm/ioapic.h
> @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ static inline struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic_irqchip(struct kvm *kvm)
>  }
>  
>  int kvm_apic_match_dest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_lapic *source,
> -		int short_hand, int dest, int dest_mode);
> +		   int short_hand, int dest, int dest_mode, int rh);
>  int kvm_apic_compare_prio(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu1, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu2);
>  void kvm_ioapic_update_eoi(struct kvm *kvm, int vector, int trigger_mode);
>  int kvm_ioapic_init(struct kvm *kvm);
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/irq_comm.c b/virt/kvm/irq_comm.c
> index 9f614b4..e53fc83 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/irq_comm.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/irq_comm.c
> @@ -68,6 +68,11 @@ static int kvm_set_ioapic_irq(struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *e,
>  	return kvm_ioapic_set_irq(ioapic, e->irqchip.pin, level);
>  }
>  
> +static inline bool kvm_is_rh_lowest_prio(struct kvm_lapic_irq *irq)
> +{
> +	return irq->redir_hint == MSI_ADDR_REDIRECTION_LOWPRI;
> +}
> +
>  inline static bool kvm_is_dm_lowest_prio(struct kvm_lapic_irq *irq)
>  {
>  #ifdef CONFIG_IA64
> @@ -93,10 +98,12 @@ int kvm_irq_delivery_to_apic(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_lapic *src,
>  			continue;
>  
>  		if (!kvm_apic_match_dest(vcpu, src, irq->shorthand,
> -					irq->dest_id, irq->dest_mode))
> +					irq->dest_id, irq->dest_mode,
> +					irq->redir_hint))
>  			continue;
>  
> -		if (!kvm_is_dm_lowest_prio(irq)) {
> +		if (!kvm_is_dm_lowest_prio(irq) &&
> +		    !kvm_is_rh_lowest_prio(irq)) {
>  			if (r < 0)
>  				r = 0;
>  			r += kvm_apic_set_irq(vcpu, irq);
> @@ -128,13 +135,14 @@ int kvm_set_msi(struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *e,
>  			MSI_ADDR_DEST_ID_MASK) >> MSI_ADDR_DEST_ID_SHIFT;
>  	irq.vector = (e->msi.data &
>  			MSI_DATA_VECTOR_MASK) >> MSI_DATA_VECTOR_SHIFT;
> +
> +	irq.redir_hint = (1 << MSI_ADDR_REDIRECTION_SHIFT) & e->msi.address_lo;
>  	irq.dest_mode = (1 << MSI_ADDR_DEST_MODE_SHIFT) & e->msi.address_lo;
>  	irq.trig_mode = (1 << MSI_DATA_TRIGGER_SHIFT) & e->msi.data;
>  	irq.delivery_mode = e->msi.data & 0x700;
>  	irq.level = 1;
>  	irq.shorthand = 0;
>  
> -	/* TODO Deal with RH bit of MSI message address */
>  	return kvm_irq_delivery_to_apic(kvm, NULL, &irq);
>  }
>  
Reading the spec it looks like it will be enough to set irq.delivery_mode
to lowest priority if RH bit is set and destination mode is logical. The
change will be contained in kvm_set_msi() function. Do I miss something?
 
--
			Gleb.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-09-01 17:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-01 16:05 [PATCH] KVM: Implement support for the RH bit Sasha Levin
2011-09-01 17:45 ` Gleb Natapov [this message]
2011-09-01 18:59   ` Sasha Levin
2011-09-01 19:31     ` Gleb Natapov
2011-09-01 19:58       ` Sasha Levin
2011-09-01 20:03         ` Gleb Natapov
2011-09-01 20:05           ` Sasha Levin
2011-09-01 20:19             ` Gleb Natapov
2011-09-01 20:24               ` Sasha Levin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110901174528.GA26451@redhat.com \
    --to=gleb@redhat.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=levinsasha928@gmail.com \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.