From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Daniel Ehrenberg <dehrenberg@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Approaches to making io_submit not block
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 09:10:57 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110902131057.GA7779@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110902130835.GB4110@thunk.org>
On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 09:08:35AM -0400, Ted Ts'o wrote:
> That may be true for hard drives, but PCIe attached flash can support
> millions of IOP's per second --- i.e., at least hundreds of IOP's in
> milliseconds. Yes, these devices are expensive, but so are the
> thousand-disk RAID arrays that some people attach via XFS. :-)
reading / writing to the devices is different from allocator calls.
You reall do not want to do an allocator call for each of these device.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-02 13:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-29 17:33 Approaches to making io_submit not block Daniel Ehrenberg
2011-08-30 5:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-08-30 21:51 ` Daniel Ehrenberg
2011-08-31 5:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-08-31 17:08 ` Andi Kleen
2011-08-31 21:00 ` Daniel Ehrenberg
2011-08-31 21:15 ` Andi Kleen
2011-09-01 4:18 ` Dave Chinner
2011-09-01 4:39 ` Andi Kleen
2011-09-01 6:54 ` Dave Chinner
2011-09-02 13:08 ` Ted Ts'o
2011-09-02 13:10 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2011-09-01 3:39 ` Dave Chinner
2011-09-01 4:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-08-30 7:02 ` Andi Kleen
[not found] ` <CAAK6Zt0Sh1GdEOb-tNf2FGXJs=e1Jbcqew13R_GdTqrv6vW97w@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <x49k49uk2ox.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
[not found] ` <4E5D5817.6040704@kernel.dk>
2011-08-30 22:19 ` Daniel Ehrenberg
2011-08-30 22:32 ` Jens Axboe
2011-08-30 22:41 ` Andrew Morton
2011-08-30 22:45 ` Daniel Ehrenberg
2011-08-30 22:54 ` Andrew Morton
2011-08-30 23:03 ` Jeremy Allison
2011-08-30 23:11 ` Andrew Morton
2011-08-31 11:04 ` Ulrich Drepper
2011-08-31 16:59 ` Jeremy Allison
2011-09-01 11:14 ` Ulrich Drepper
2011-09-01 15:58 ` Jeremy Allison
2011-09-01 16:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-01 16:15 ` Jeremy Allison
2011-09-01 16:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-01 16:31 ` Jeremy Allison
2011-09-01 16:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-01 16:34 ` Jeremy Allison
2011-09-01 16:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-01 16:57 ` Jeremy Allison
2011-08-31 5:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-08-31 6:04 ` guy keren
2011-08-31 23:16 ` Daniel Ehrenberg
2011-08-31 23:48 ` guy keren
2011-08-31 23:59 ` Daniel Ehrenberg
2011-08-31 15:45 ` Gleb Natapov
2011-08-31 16:02 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110902131057.GA7779@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=dehrenberg@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.