From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:36637)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mst@redhat.com>) id 1R0FOs-0006jI-Mx
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2011 12:18:27 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mst@redhat.com>) id 1R0FOr-000312-N4
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2011 12:18:26 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:41707)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mst@redhat.com>) id 1R0FOr-00030h-Fy
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2011 12:18:25 -0400
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2011 19:19:16 +0300
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20110904161915.GC31273@redhat.com>
References: <20110904134101.GA27239@redhat.com> <4E638355.8030903@redhat.com>
	<20110904142152.GB27239@redhat.com> <4E638D08.10307@redhat.com>
	<20110904145425.GC27239@redhat.com> <4E6395CE.3010309@redhat.com>
	<20110904152409.GA30376@redhat.com> <4E639B24.7090100@redhat.com>
	<20110904154519.GA31273@redhat.com> <4E639D66.6090506@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4E639D66.6090506@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pci: add standard bridge device
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@valinux.co.jp>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 06:46:46PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 09/04/2011 06:45 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 06:37:08PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >>  On 09/04/2011 06:24 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >>  >>
> >>  >>   Of course it doesn't ignore it.  See the 440fx implementation, if
> >>  >>   you disable VGA access (via the SMRAM register), vga goes away.
> >>  >
> >>  >Yes but that's for VGA RAM, right? I'm talking about the IO addresses:
> >>  >are tons of aliases created as you suggest?
> >>
> >>  No.
> >
> >So a full 16 bit decode is done for now?
> >
> 
> Correct.

Then we probably can ignore the issue and do 16 bit decode all over
for now.

> But isn't it needed?  Otherwise why don't vga accesses
> alias with a virtio device at 0xc3c0?

It really depends on the device I think.

> -- 
> error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function