From: Moritz Wilhelmy <ml+mmj@wzff.de>
To: mlmmj@mlmmj.org
Subject: [mlmmj] read(2) syscall bloat
Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 11:56:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110905115603.GC22957@barfooze.de> (raw)
Hello,
mlmmj currently does a read(2) system call for every single byte it
reads from a file descriptor. This is unnecessarily inefficient and
slow.
Strace output is similar to the following:
open("/var/spool/mlmmj/foo/control/listaddress", O_RDONLY) = 4
read(4, "f", 1) = 1
read(4, "o", 1) = 1
read(4, "o", 1) = 1
read(4, "@", 1) = 1
read(4, "l", 1) = 1
read(4, "i", 1) = 1
read(4, "s", 1) = 1
read(4, "t", 1) = 1
read(4, "s", 1) = 1
read(4, ".", 1) = 1
read(4, "e", 1) = 1
read(4, "x", 1) = 1
read(4, "a", 1) = 1
read(4, "m", 1) = 1
read(4, "p", 1) = 1
read(4, "l", 1) = 1
read(4, "e", 1) = 1
read(4, ".", 1) = 1
read(4, "c", 1) = 1
read(4, "o", 1) = 1
read(4, "m", 1) = 1
read(4, "\n", 1) = 1
close(4) = 0
Given that there is a getline(3) function in POSIX.1-2008, shouldn't it
be possible to retire mygetline?
I've previously posted this issue to the musl mailing list [1], which
has an "anti-bloat side project", but I've been putting the mail to this
list off.
I don't see where any of Rich's arguments from [2] apply. Can anyone
please explain why it was done this way in the first place?
[1] http://www.openwall.com/lists/musl/2011/08/16/8
[2] http://www.openwall.com/lists/musl/2011/08/16/11
Moritz
next reply other threads:[~2011-09-05 11:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-05 11:56 Moritz Wilhelmy [this message]
2011-09-05 12:30 ` [mlmmj] read(2) syscall bloat Lukas Fleischer
2011-09-05 12:34 ` Ben Schmidt
2011-09-05 12:46 ` Lukas Fleischer
2011-09-05 12:57 ` Moritz Wilhelmy
2011-09-09 8:24 ` Thomas Goirand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110905115603.GC22957@barfooze.de \
--to=ml+mmj@wzff.de \
--cc=mlmmj@mlmmj.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.