Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm: Add comment explaining task state setting in bdi_forker_thread()

[Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>]

On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 06:01:41PM +0800, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Sun 04-09-11 11:05:51, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > > @@ -401,6 +401,13 @@ static int bdi_forker_thread(void *ptr)
> > >  		}
> > >  
> > >  		spin_lock_bh(&bdi_lock);
> > > +		/*
> > > +		 * In the following loop we are going to check whether we have
> > > +		 * some work to do without any synchronization with tasks
> > > +		 * waking us up to do work for them. So we have to set task
> > > +		 * state already here so that we don't miss wakeups coming
> > 
> > s/already/early/ ?
>   Thanks for review. We'd have to substitute 'already here' with 'early'
> for the sentence to make make sense. But frankly I don't see why one would
> be better than the other one...

You are the native English speaker?  OK, I have no more problems... ;)

Thanks,
Fengguang