From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>,
Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/6] Device state visualization reloaded
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 20:05:30 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110906170529.GA22871@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E664A19.5000207@codemonkey.ws>
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 11:28:09AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 09/06/2011 11:09 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 10:51:26AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >>On 09/06/2011 10:45 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >>>On 2011-09-06 16:48, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >>>>I'm afraid that won't be enough to stop people
> >>>>scripting this command - libvirt accessed
> >>>>HMP for years.
> >>>>
> >>>>On the other hand, no QMP command means e.g.
> >>>>libvirt users don't get any benefit from this.
> >>>>
> >>>>What I think will solve these problems, for both HMP and QMP,
> >>>>is an explicit 'debug_unstable' or 'debug_unsupported' command that will
> >>>>expose all kind of debugging functionality making it
> >>>>very explicit that it's an unsupported debugging utility.
> >>>>
> >>>>Proposed syntax:
> >>>>
> >>>>debug_unstable<subcommand> <options>
> >>>>
> >>>>Example:
> >>>>
> >>>>debug_unstable device_show -all
> >>>
> >>>For HMP, this would needlessly complicate the user interface, nothing I
> >>>would support. People scripting things on top of HMP are generally doing
> >>>this on their own risk and cannot expect output stability.
> >>>
> >>>device_show is like info qtree: the output will naturally change as the
> >>>emulated hardware evolves, information is added/removed, or we simply
> >>>improve the layout. Recent changes on info network are an example for
> >>>the latter.
> >>
> >>Yeah, I'm not worried about stability. HMP commands that aren't
> >>exposed as QMP commands are inherently unstable and should not be
> >>scripted to.
> >
> >They are also not accessible when using libvirt, right?
>
> $ virsh human-monitor-passthrough GuestName device_show foo
>
> Should work.
So how, in the end, will user know it's unsupported?
I don't agree with 'all HMP is unstable' as people
will use it and will come to depend on it.
What I'm asking is something like 'enable_unsupported_commands',
which will expose all kind of stuff.
Could also be extra stuff in existing commands too -
e.g. info pci is a natural way to see config space
for devices.
--
MST
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-06 17:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-26 14:48 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/6] Device state visualization reloaded Jan Kiszka
2011-08-26 14:48 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/6] monitor: return length of printed string via monitor_[v]printf Jan Kiszka
2011-08-26 14:48 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/6] Add base64 encoder/decoder Jan Kiszka
2011-08-26 15:21 ` Peter Maydell
2011-08-26 15:23 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-08-26 15:47 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-08-26 18:02 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-09-02 17:22 ` Luiz Capitulino
2011-09-05 13:55 ` [Qemu-devel] required glib version? " Gerd Hoffmann
2011-08-26 14:48 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/6] QMP: Reserve namespace for complex object classes Jan Kiszka
2011-09-02 17:23 ` Luiz Capitulino
2011-09-02 17:47 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-09-02 18:02 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-08-26 14:48 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/6] QMP: Add QBuffer Jan Kiszka
2011-08-26 18:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 " Jan Kiszka
2011-08-26 14:48 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/6] monitor: Add basic device state visualization Jan Kiszka
2011-08-26 14:48 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/6] qdev: Generate IDs for anonymous devices Jan Kiszka
2011-08-29 19:23 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-08-29 20:56 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-08-29 21:19 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-08-31 18:31 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-09-07 9:50 ` Gleb Natapov
2011-09-07 10:27 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-09-07 10:34 ` Gleb Natapov
2011-09-07 10:58 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-08-29 19:22 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/6] Device state visualization reloaded Anthony Liguori
2011-08-29 20:54 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-09-02 17:27 ` Luiz Capitulino
2011-09-06 14:48 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-09-06 15:45 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-09-06 15:51 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-09-06 16:05 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-09-06 16:08 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-09-06 16:33 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-09-06 16:09 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-09-06 16:28 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-09-06 17:05 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2011-09-07 9:37 ` Kevin Wolf
2011-09-07 13:06 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-09-07 13:13 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-09-07 13:17 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-09-07 13:23 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-09-07 13:29 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-09-07 13:33 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-09-06 16:29 ` Jan Kiszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110906170529.GA22871@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.