From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] staging: hv: Add support for >2 TB LUN in storage driver. Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 12:06:15 -0700 Message-ID: <20110906190615.GA31897@kroah.com> References: <1314915069-1796-1-git-send-email-mike.sterling@microsoft.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1314915069-1796-1-git-send-email-mike.sterling@microsoft.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mike Sterling Cc: haiyangz@microsoft.com, hjanssen@microsoft.com, kys@microsoft.com, gregkh@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devel@linuxdriverproject.org, virtualization@lists.osdl.org List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 03:11:09PM -0700, Mike Sterling wrote: > If a LUN larger than 2 TB is attached to a Linux VM on Hyper-V, we currently > report a maximum size of 2 TB. This patch resolves the issue in hv_storvsc. > Thanks to Robert Scheck for reporting the issue. > > Reported-by: Robert Scheck > Signed-off-by: Mike Sterling > Signed-off-by: K.Y. Srinivasan > Signed-off-by: Haiyang Zhang > --- > drivers/staging/hv/hyperv_storage.h | 1 + This file is no longer in the latest kernel tree (linux-next or staging-next). What tree did you generate this patch against? And how come Haiyang and KY didn't catch such a basic mistake in their review... I'm guessing that this patch was not even tested :( Please fix this and resend. greg k-h