From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755455Ab1IFXyl (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Sep 2011 19:54:41 -0400 Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:59480 "EHLO out4.smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755424Ab1IFXyQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Sep 2011 19:54:16 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: XHlpBjxTL9Ylpb9Dxsd7UW8EYniXh1Og7Wn0d482seMd 1315353255 Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 16:52:53 -0700 From: Greg KH To: H Hartley Sweeten Cc: Linux Kernel , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, hverkuil@xs4all.nl, gregkh@suse.de, mchehab@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Staging: dt3155v4l: Convert printk's to pr_ Message-ID: <20110906235253.GC26281@kroah.com> References: <201109011653.56089.hartleys@visionengravers.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201109011653.56089.hartleys@visionengravers.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 04:53:55PM -0700, H Hartley Sweeten wrote: > Convert all the printk(KERN_) messages in the driver to pr_() > and use pr_fmt to provide the module name. What's wrong with using dev_* instead of pr_*? Lots of these should be converted to that format instead, right? thanks, greg k-h