From: dave.martin@linaro.org (Dave Martin)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 2/3] ARM: iwmmxt: Port problematic iwmmxt support code to v7/Thumb-2
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 09:58:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110908085800.GB2070@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1790084.iooACCopcX@wuerfel>
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 10:35:46PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 September 2011 09:13:38 Eric Miao wrote:
> > >
> > > +/*
> > > + * When enough people have binutils which support -march=...+iwmmxt, this
> > > + * should change to #if __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ < 7.
> > > + */
> > > +#ifndef CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL
> > > mrc p15, 0, r1, c2, c0, 0
> > > sub pc, lr, r1, lsr #32 @ cpwait and return
> > > +#else
> > > + isb @ ISB needed instead on ARMv7
> > > + mov pc, lr
> > > +#endif
> >
> > Or maybe using ARM() and THUMB() will be a better fit here?
>
> I think it would be logical to use XSC() and PJ4() instead, as those are used
> elsehere in this file. However, that doesn't work with the only binutils.
I take pj4 and older platforms can never be built in the same kernel?
Otherwise, this approach is totally broken anyway-- we'll generate code
which won't run on some of the kernel's supported platforms.
> If the !THUMB code above is actually correct for v7 in ARM mode (i.e. it performs
> the equivalent of an ISB), then I think we should leave it.
With the proposed change to use cc-option in the Makefile,
we have the option of using the v7 code whenever binutils supports
it, and printing a warning otherwise.
> It does look like it's whitespace broken though.
I'll double-check that.
Cheers
---Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-08 8:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-07 15:59 [RFC PATCH 0/3] ARM: iwmmxt/pj4 fixes for v7/Thumb-2 Dave Martin
2011-09-07 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] ARM: iwmmxt: Fix Makefile rules for building iwmmxt for Thumb-2 Dave Martin
2011-09-07 16:10 ` Eric Miao
2011-09-07 17:18 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-09-07 20:32 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-09-08 8:53 ` Dave Martin
2011-09-07 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] ARM: iwmmxt: Port problematic iwmmxt support code to v7/Thumb-2 Dave Martin
2011-09-07 16:13 ` Eric Miao
2011-09-07 20:35 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-09-08 8:58 ` Dave Martin [this message]
2011-09-08 9:01 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-09-08 11:33 ` Dave Martin
2011-09-08 14:40 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-09-07 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] ARM: pxa/pj4: Port problematic pj4 " Dave Martin
2011-09-07 16:18 ` Eric Miao
2011-09-07 20:27 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-09-08 8:58 ` Haojian Zhuang
2011-09-08 11:10 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2011-09-08 11:35 ` Dave Martin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110908085800.GB2070@arm.com \
--to=dave.martin@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.