From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932908Ab1IJOLE (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Sep 2011 10:11:04 -0400 Received: from mail.wdtv.com ([66.118.69.84]:38397 "EHLO mail.wdtv.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932201Ab1IJOLB (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Sep 2011 10:11:01 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 440 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 10:11:01 EDT From: Gene Heskett To: Lin Ming Subject: Re: [PATCH] logo: Change regular 224-color tux logo to something more appropriate for Linux 3.1 Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 10:03:38 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/2.6.38.8-pclos3.pae.bfs; KDE/4.6.5; i686; ; ) Cc: djwong@djwong.org, Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, josh@joshtriplett.org References: <20110910085546.GV23283@sweaglesw.org> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="windows-1256" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201109101003.38935.gene.heskett@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Saturday, September 10, 2011, Lin Ming wrote: >On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 4:55 PM, wrote: >> For Linux 3.1, I thought we could change the 224-color framebuffer logo >> to something more apropos given the version number. As the patch is >> quite large, I'm only inlining the changelog. 8) >> >> See http://djwong.org/docs/31-tuxlogo.patch for too-large-for-lkml >> patch, http://djwong.org/docs/31-tuxlogo.png for a PNG logo, or > >Funny, does it look like Win98's logo? Yes, entirely too much of an imitation. I will not contaminate my Linux install with it. Cheers, gene -- "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) My web page: "The human brain is like an enormous fish -- it is flat and slimy and has gills through which it can see." -- Monty Python